rnovi
AH fanatic
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2012
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 844
- Location
- Smyrna, TN
- Media
- 27
- Articles
- 1
- Member of
- NRA, SCI, HFMA, and a Certified KCBS BBQ Judge
- Hunted
- South Africa, Texas, Alaska - hey, they count. Trust me!
Scopes drive me batty as all heck. I can never quite make my mind up. A decent lighted ret scope is going to be 18 oz+ and be a 30mm body. Heavy in so many ways. And then there's the question of what makes a GOOD hunting scope.
One of my favorite scopes is a Leupold fx3 6x42 with the LR dot reticle. At 11oz it's light, has great glass, the dots are perfectly set for shots out to 500 yards without the need for a turret. I've tested it to 500 and it is right on the money, each and every time. Moreover, it's simple. There are no adjustments to screw with: point, put it on the shoulder and shoot. That, and it's really an elegantly pretty scope.
But then I want that exact same scope to be lighted...and I'm pushed into a 30mm tube and it weights half a pound more with bigger rings. And I want better glass - not that it's ever made a single bit of difference in my hunting. That fx3 is plenty bright to well beyond legal limits. Pick do lose the reticle when it's truly dark out.
So I find myself wanting TWO scopes. One for the range...with higher power and one for the hunt that's lighter and simpler.
Honestly, it's the weight that gets me more than anything else. That, and for whatever useless reason my eyes like Leica glass just that hair more...but again, it's never caused me to have to pass on a shot.
And I've not found the 6x limiting on game to 400 yards. The bigger deal is getting steady enough.
I do love the leupold lr dot reticle. It's so easy to use and not busy. Add a lighted dot and it might be as perfect as it gets. But then it's not that great Leica glass.
I'm really not helping this conversation at all, am I?
Everything is about personal taste at just that right moment...
One of my favorite scopes is a Leupold fx3 6x42 with the LR dot reticle. At 11oz it's light, has great glass, the dots are perfectly set for shots out to 500 yards without the need for a turret. I've tested it to 500 and it is right on the money, each and every time. Moreover, it's simple. There are no adjustments to screw with: point, put it on the shoulder and shoot. That, and it's really an elegantly pretty scope.
But then I want that exact same scope to be lighted...and I'm pushed into a 30mm tube and it weights half a pound more with bigger rings. And I want better glass - not that it's ever made a single bit of difference in my hunting. That fx3 is plenty bright to well beyond legal limits. Pick do lose the reticle when it's truly dark out.
So I find myself wanting TWO scopes. One for the range...with higher power and one for the hunt that's lighter and simpler.
Honestly, it's the weight that gets me more than anything else. That, and for whatever useless reason my eyes like Leica glass just that hair more...but again, it's never caused me to have to pass on a shot.
And I've not found the 6x limiting on game to 400 yards. The bigger deal is getting steady enough.
I do love the leupold lr dot reticle. It's so easy to use and not busy. Add a lighted dot and it might be as perfect as it gets. But then it's not that great Leica glass.
I'm really not helping this conversation at all, am I?
Everything is about personal taste at just that right moment...