The issue (at least in USA) isn’t 243/6mm or 6.5mm. It’s that marketing and long range target shooters have turned the 6.5 creedmoor into something it isn’t for hunting. So a large portion of people (usually including myself) hear the word creedmoor and automatically say no.STOP THE COUNT!
I just heard there's a new cartridge called 25Creedmoor. You know for those who simply can't decide between 6mm and 6.5mm
Exactly!Disparage it all you want. But the great things about the 6.5 Creedmoor are that it carries roughly twice the energy at 500 yards of what a 243 does and it does it with no noticeable difference in recoil. It was designed for long range with minimal recoil and it does that exceedingly well. ....
@CBHMy Brother has an urge to buy another rifle so who am I to say it’s a bad idea. He has a .308 Browning X Bolt for light carry and the recoil is sharp.
He has a Lithgow Crossover in .223 and has designs on a second Lithgow Crossover.
Available factory options include .243, 6.5cm and .308.
He is leaning toward a .243 because they are well established in Australia and with moderate recoil he is comfortable shooting from the car and over the bench and taking pigs and other pests that present. Maybe small deer species if opportunity presents
Now with the 6.5 cm being available he has considered it.
I formed an opinion long ago that 7mm-08 is a good allrounder mainly as I was considering I wanted a true short action compact rifle with a projectile with a minimum diameter of .270.
Yesterday the truth came out that while the 6.5cm is relatively new he is concerned that I, (What Me?) might associate the 6.5 trendmore with names like, Latte, Hipster and Man Bun making it sound gay. It’s only a cartridge FFS.
Anyway would any of my new found friends here like to write hear about your preferences?
It’s not a fad but it’s not replacing my 7mm-08 for me.
@CBHIt’s probably better , I think it’s been around longer.
@samuSTOP THE COUNT!
I just heard there's a new cartridge called 25Creedmoor. You know for those who simply can't decide between 6mm and 6.5mm
Fake news?How is a .243 just a 6.5 with a bigger bullet? .243 shoots a .243 bullet and the 6.5 shoots a .264 bullet.
see post 39.Fake news?
Yep, see it now. Didn't even realize posts were numbered. I'm techno challenged!see post 39.
Wheel has definitely been reinvented and I suspect it will happen again and again as long as there's one fool left to part with their money for sake of novelty.@samu
The 25 credemore has been around since the 250/3000 Savage was born.it is called the 250 Savage AI.
The 6.5 creed is just a necked up 250AI with a different shoulder angle. Maybe we could end up reinventing the wheel.
Bob
Nope. Still .30TCAnd then there is the 30 Creedmoor.
Mistakenly referred to as the 308 Winchester by some.
@samuWheel has definitely been reinvented and I suspect it will happen again and again as long as there's one fool left to part with their money for sake of novelty.
I do have to correct you though. 6.5 Creedmoor is developed out of .30 Thompson Center which to my knowledge had no parent case it was developed from.
Nope. Still .30TC
Really the best part about 6.5 Creedmoor, notice the spelling, is how it has the capability of rise the blood pressure of some people by just mere hint at the name. If I said I hunt with 6.5x55 people would just nod and grunt agreeingly and someone would mention how people kill moose in sweden with it. With creedmoor I get the exact same result in the business end with slightly easier load development, less powder consumption and less heat load in the suppressor PLUS I get to enjoy discussions like these wherever I go. And if I need to buy factory ammo, even around here these days, creamdoor factory loads have 30-100fps advantage over the swede.
There's one problem though. I personally like pour over coffee from properly green washed small plantation and I can't get over the phase where the hair is kind of too long but not long enough for the man bun so I just give up and get it hacked down again. I guess what I try to say the stereotype is way off.
Bigger question is why not call it 6.5 Hornady. TC was developed for another company and flopped magnificently so no wonder they didn't want to keep the name. Notice how 6.5PRC and 300PRC also are developed by Hornady and have names that don't directly refer to them. Something I wonder is if the company that develops and gets the cartridge added to CIP/SAAMI books gets some kind of compensation when other companies produce brass or ammo for that? If not, how does Hornady actually benefit from pushing new chamberings on market?@samu
Well why didn't they call it the 6.5 TC like normal people do when the use a different call on a parent case like 22/250 , 7/08, 400/450
It may be a great cartridge for hunting/ target but I'm just an old school type and can't see the sense in filling gaps that don't exist.
Dang even my 4x4 is still old school.
Bob
@AZDAVE It would have to be a lot of money to make it happen plus a bottle of Bundy.@Bob Nelson 35Whelen "That would be akin to me puncing around the bush in ballet shoes, a pink tutu and a magic wand." we should take up a collection of $$$ that would be paid to see a pic of your visit to the bush so dressed
Aside from the joking, manufactures make money on coming up with new things that do exactly what the old reliable rounds have been doing for years. When used for the right situation the 6.5 creed does what it was designed for. There will be folks that try and push it and others into a role that is a step to far but then that is human nature. In spring 2021 I am taking my 500 Jeff to backup a buddy on a DG hunt and my 6.5creed to the EC with KMG for small plains game and night kritters. Both are a correct tool for me on the game that are intended to hunt.