Do go on about this testing...how hot were you able to run them? That barrel on your #1 looks like a rechambering and reboring job? Any idea what the original caliber was?
Hey Forest, no I really have not done anything with this, nothing like any serious load data or pressure data. Just not my intentions with this rifle/cartridge.
Heres the deal, friend of mine had it for sale, contacted me, I love Big Bore rifles, and I thought it might be fun to play with. He told me that some years ago the rifle started life as a 416 Remington, he sent it somewhere to have it "ReBored"..... now I know nothing about "Rebore", I had always started with a new barrel and go from there......... It is also 1:15 twist rate, which seems common in .510 caliber. Later he sent the gun to SSK and Brian did a deep black mirror finish blue job on it, and it is incredible, Brian does a hell of a job with that high polish finish. Not sure what else he had Brian do at the time, if anything. He had 150 pieces of New Starline 50-90 brass and the dies...... I figured I had to see what it was about.
I had and have no serious intentions of doing extensive load data, that just was not my goal for this. I will never hunt the gun and won't be in the field with it, since I have retired from actual hunting. I have a lot of .510 caliber bullets on hand, and wanted to see if I could get the 475 Raptors to around 2200 or so along with the 510 Solids from CEB. That is accomplished now, so I may not dig much more into it. I have a good cast load for the Cast Performance bullets I have left over from 20+ years ago, so that won't be a pursuit either.
Its a spiffy rifle, I intend to look into some sort of better sight system, although it is able to put 510/475s in the same hole dead center at 25 yards, irons, and I can't see crap nor shoot irons very well, maybe we just got lucky yesterday...... HEH...... Also it needs a decent recoil pad.......
I don't shoot a 500 NE double so have no practical experience however I have read quite a bit on double gun regulation and the issues with changing loads from what the gun was regulated for. It would seem that pushing a lighter bullet at greater velocity would change the POI between the two barrels one way or the other. Did you (or your friend) find any appreciable change in the POI of the barrels?
No issues with the doubles and the CEB bullets, either 570/535s or 510/475s, just find the right loads and most of that is with RL 15 and we had a great load with WW 760 as well........ I am not a double rifle fan....... I don't own or want one. My friend however has well over 2 dozen of the things and he hunts mostly with 577NE....... using CEBs. He also dropped the standard weights of that caliber as well to 650 Solids and 600 Raptors...... Doubles are indeed finicky. I had one of his doubles here continuing the research on barrel strain, pressures, I even did some powder blending with it. He wanted me to get it ready, so I had a great load with WW 760, at 25 yards the left/right in the same hole for me.......... He arrived, shot the gun, and the same load was 4 inches apart for him? The way we held the gun........ Yeah, thats a little finicky for my tastes........
Anyway, I shoot a No 1 so I'm particularly interested in the load data for the 50-90 Sharps, specifically the amount of H322 used and the cartridge OAL for the bullets mentioned .... and do you recall the primers used?
Yeah, I am going to PM you this, since honestly I am not familiar with the various strengths of different rifles chambered in 50-90, I am quite sure that some of these loads might be a bit much for some guns, and would not wish to cause confusion, this is Ruger #1 only..........
And remember, I really have done very very little on this, just a couple of sessions on the range, no pressure data, and not really much to it........I took well established data from my own 500 B&M, which is .500 caliber, 2.5 inch RUM case for bolt guns......... I looked at the few powders I played with for 500 gr .500 caliber bullets, and moved that over to the 50-90....... whatever pressures I had in 500 B&M would be LESS in the 50-90, because of the larger case capacity and larger diameter. Regardless I lowered the charge to start with anyway, following good safe practices........ One of my powder choices did not work out, IMR 8208 did not behave well, and H-322 behaved pretty good with no issues..........