Pondoro
AH elite
I also beleive the beaver and splinter forends are a matter of aesthetics, but I want to stand corrected if that is not the case.
Correct..
I also beleive the beaver and splinter forends are a matter of aesthetics, but I want to stand corrected if that is not the case.
Velo Dog, Thanks for your feedback, and it seems you have had not so a good experience with prior model VC's or the ones you have handled other than the newer round receivers/body.
One thing on the 26" barrells is I have heard quite a few experienced people prefer to have this length and I want to know why? How does it help or is it only aesthetics? My limited knowledge tells me it may be little tighter in the bush and more impartantly you are adding 4 " more of barrell weight plus the counter weight in the body to balance.. SO you are looking at adding 12-14 ounces to a already heavy rifle and have heard that it can make a difference in the rugged and hot terrains. This is just my thought but I would like to know the advantages of a 26"?
cheers, this forum has been an eye opener!
Hello, I would like to add my thoughts about 450-400 versus .470. As a licensed Zimbabwe PH who has had extensive use with both, I would like to give this advice the .450-400 is a very nice rifle to shoot (and master). Penetration is excellent, although just marginal for elephant. With the correct bullet such as woodleighs soft or solids in a quality rifle such as the Heym 88 or the new 99 you will not be underguned. My wife who is a Zimbabwe learner PH uses a Heym 88 with Hornady cartridges and has taken elephant, buffalo, hippo. She does feel it is time for her to move up to .470 & it will be either the 88 or 99 Heym. My carry double is a pre war George Gibbs in .470 a magnificent rifle that has done it all. I also own a pre war .450-400 3" Westley Richards. At the end of the day for a sport hunter coming to Africa for a dangerous game safari you cannot go wrong with the .450-400, but before you come practice, practice, practice, which will be much more pleasant with the .450-400 3". Cheers, TokolosheHello Everyone,
First thank you all for all the great information that is being offered here. I have learned a lot and continue to learn more every time I visit this forum. I do have some experience in using a 12 bore paradox (my grandpas) some English make but pretty darn powerful. He used to hunt Royal Bengal tigers back in the day in India with it.
Of late i have been fascinated to own a double. I wish to go to Africa in the next couple of years and as such in a quest for a good double. My sights are on a Heym 470 but of late I see lot of good reviews/feedback from experienced hunters on the 450/400 cartidge. I'm a novice at best so to say on calibers and difficult to understand all the nuances. I also plan to use the rifle for some fun trips in the US. Please help me decide.
I hope to find out in the next few years. That is unless I wind up with a double gun!It will do the trick! Wonder how well it would do on rhino.
I hope to find out in the next few years. That is unless I wind up with a double gun!
Philip
Heym makes a larger action as an option, this is also newer more broad and slightly different design. Helps with the recoil due to its weight factor. Anyone has any experience with this?
View attachment 154233
According to the recoil chart, 56 ft.lbs. For a 450/400 would be an 8.5 to 9 lb rifle. Shoot it out of a 10.5 lb double and it’s around 40 ft.lbs. Very manageable.56 ft lbs of recoil from a 450/400 versus 68 ft lbs of recoil from a 470 isn’t trivial, but it’s an 18% increase in recoil and more than 18% more effective on dangerous game, hence why its preferred for elephant, hippo, etc.
According to the recoil chart, 56 ft.lbs. For a 450/400 would be an 8.5 to 9 lb rifle. Shoot it out of a 10.5 lb double and it’s around 40 ft.lbs. Very manageable.