bruce moulds
AH legend
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2018
- Messages
- 2,871
- Reaction score
- 4,842
the 400/350 shot a 310 gn bullet, and taylor preferred it over the no 2 and 350 mag with their lighter bullets. (225gn?)
the 400/350 shot a 310 gn bullet, and taylor preferred it over the no 2 and 350 mag with their lighter bullets. (225gn?)
But since you said eland get a 9.3x62 make sure it fits her and take her to Africa. The larger the rifle the more critical the rifle fit to the shooter is. When my wife started shooting her 338 Ruger compact mag I fit it (all of her rifles have the same stock) to a laminated thumbhole stock with a 1 1/8 kickeze pad on it. She shoot it lights out, I just built her a 375 H&H with the exact same fit for her buffalo hunt next year. So I would get your wife's rifle fit by a competent gun fitter and fit a rifle to her exact physcial size, it helps so much on recoil management.
rule 303,
at least you still have yours somewhere.
I lent mine to someone, and it is now in the big vacuum in the sky.
bruce.
Considering my spouses more diminutive stature, we are in search of the most versatile set-up in an eland gun for her to use during our next safari, after she informed this trophy is now at the top of her list. Until now she has been extremely successful using her 6.5 Creedmoor or suppressed .270 with all one-shot kills in everything up to and including kudu. My 300 H&H is still on the lighter end of the spectrum for eland and just not a good physical fit, while my 375 Ruger remains a bit much to tame.
After much searching and looking at reviews it appears that the venerable 35 Whelen might be just what we are looking for. The CVA Scout V2 chambered in such appears to check of the most boxes when considering the following criteria:
IADiverConsidering my spouses more diminutive stature, we are in search of the most versatile set-up in an eland gun for her to use during our next safari, after she informed this trophy is now at the top of her list. Until now she has been extremely successful using her 6.5 Creedmoor or suppressed .270 with all one-shot kills in everything up to and including kudu. My 300 H&H is still on the lighter end of the spectrum for eland and just not a good physical fit, while my 375 Ruger remains a bit much to tame.
After much searching and looking at reviews it appears that the venerable 35 Whelen might be just what we are looking for. The CVA Scout V2 chambered in such appears to check of the most boxes when considering the following criteria:
· Accuracy and quality reviews
· Performance versus recoil#
· Cost and availability of ammunition (225 or 250gr)
· Adjustable fit and weight
· Initial acquisition cost
Any thoughts or better options for the huntress?
ShootistThe CVA Scout V2 you mention shows to be a 5.8 pound rifle before optics. With the 35 Whelan pushing 3,000 or so foot pounds, the free recoil is going to be way up there, I would think.
Also, the Sectional Density for the .35 is on the low end for such a big bullet. (Only .251 for a 225.) Possibly this is offset by the larger cross sectional area, however.
As an FYI we chronograph a shooting buddy's Rem700 7mm RM hunting rifle last weekend. Factory Hornady 162 gr averaged 2,908 using a Magneto Speed V3. Recoil was not mild and probably considerably more than my 338 WM (with brake) pushing a 185 Barnes at 2,925.
Looking at the Swift reloading manual, as well as advertised specs for a couple of factory 7mm RM 175s, about 2,750 to 2,800 fps is realistic for his rifle with 175 grain bullets. I think his barrel is a 22", but it might be a 24.
Spike.tWell eventually..... Better late than never to defend and promote that 35 whatchumacallit thing..........one day you will realise that the 9.3x62 is of course far superior......
![]()
Rob404A while back I bought a used Remington (late 80s mod) in 35Whelen I worked on some loads and got it to shoot great. Over the winter I refinished the stock and I now have a great looking and a great shooter, When I go to Namibia it will be in my gun case
Spike.t
Superior to what, an air rifle maybe but the old Whelan is just a fine cartridge that gets the job done. It's the quiet achiever and doesn't rely on all the hype and hoopla. One day you might realize you 9.3 is nothing more than a metric Whelan.
Bruce mouldsespecially when you compare bullets with similar sectional density.
to a degree, with this also comes ballistic coefficient.
the 338 federal is a great deer stopper, but less of a bigger game cartridge.
bruce.
ShootistThe CVA Scout V2 you mention shows to be a 5.8 pound rifle before optics. With the 35 Whelan pushing 3,000 or so foot pounds, the free recoil is going to be way up there, I would think.
Also, the Sectional Density for the .35 is on the low end for such a big bullet. (Only .251 for a 225.) Possibly this is offset by the larger cross sectional area, however.
As an FYI we chronograph a shooting buddy's Rem700 7mm RM hunting rifle last weekend. Factory Hornady 162 gr averaged 2,908 using a Magneto Speed V3. Recoil was not mild and probably considerably more than my 338 WM (with brake) pushing a 185 Barnes at 2,925.
Looking at the Swift reloading manual, as well as advertised specs for a couple of factory 7mm RM 175s, about 2,750 to 2,800 fps is realistic for his rifle with 175 grain bullets. I think his barrel is a 22", but it might be a 24.
SestoppelmanOn that I agree if that was your point. The .35 "WHELEN" or .338-06 are great rounds, had both, but currently only the Whelen. But I have a Ruger 77 Win mag and a post 64 Win mag on the way, just snagged. I remember the first time I ever fired a Win mag. It was in Idaho with factory loads in a model 70 Win. It was illuminating! However compared to the .375 and up its a pussycat, especially if loaded down a tad. I like to shoot 200-225gr bullets in mine using R15 and similar powders for bench target practice.
SestoppelmanOK guys, History and spelling lesson for the day. The .35 WHELEN was named for Col. Townsend WHELEN. Not WhAlen
and not WhelAn.
Its WHELEN. Thank you!
And the first guy to blame his device, spell check, auto correct or anything else gets three demerits!
![]()
Rob 404So is it a 35Wail-On then?
SestoppelmanI am a fan of the round, had several over the years Currently have a nice custom 1903 Springfield that I had bored out to the Whelen. The one I wish I still had was a nice Sauer Mauser 98K that I had barreled and set up as a woods rifle, Lyman Peep sight, matte blue finish. Dang good shooter too, but sold it for something else years ago.
Tried to buy it back but the guy wouldn't cut loose of it, then he up an died and who knows where it is now. Oh well.
I will say I never ran mine up where you are. I was quite happy to be a couple hundred fps below your obviously maximum loads. And they are maximum loads regardless how your rifle handles them. I shudder to think of it.