Today, all modern guns will have rear pad in the stock to reduce recoil and make it more comfortable.
But from what I see on old catalogues, rifles used to have a pad, but double rifles didn’t. For example I have in front of me the Holland catalogue from 1910, where rifles would have pads, but the 375 double rifle wouldn’t.
Personally, I like the esthetic of a plain stock with no pad, and tend to think that maybe medium double rifles may not use it as it is very rare to shoot many times, compared to normal rifles where you can shoot up to 5 times for example….
What is your opinion on not using pads on >375 size?
But from what I see on old catalogues, rifles used to have a pad, but double rifles didn’t. For example I have in front of me the Holland catalogue from 1910, where rifles would have pads, but the 375 double rifle wouldn’t.
Personally, I like the esthetic of a plain stock with no pad, and tend to think that maybe medium double rifles may not use it as it is very rare to shoot many times, compared to normal rifles where you can shoot up to 5 times for example….
What is your opinion on not using pads on >375 size?