What Watch do you wear when you hunt?

DiCaprio just signed on to be an ambassador for Rolex recently. Didn't take them long to throw him and Scorsese into a commercial.
 
DiCaprio just signed on to be an ambassador for Rolex recently. Didn't take them long to throw him and Scorsese into a commercial.

He got tired of being on the Daytona waiting list and is too cheap to pay gray market prices. This was his best choice for a Newman.
 
It seems that Rolex is taking control of the retail experience. They purchased Bucherer recently, which also owns Torneau. These are the largest watch retailers worldwide. Meanwhile, they are ending relationships with stand alone or jewelry store authorized dealers, at least here in Minnesota and few other states where I know people who have relationships with dealers. I suspect the new market will shift considerably as a result. I'm not sure if it will better or worse as far as availability, but it appears that the situation is going to be different at minimum.
 
IMG_4117.jpeg
 
Beautiful Omega Aqua Terra. Not sure why you wouldn't hunt with it. Seems to be the perfect face color for a proper hunt.
Too thick and most importantly no quick adjust lol! I’ve been leaning towards thinner for hunting because of how the layers of cuffs interact and annoy me. Last season wore a komandirskie tanker manual wind on leather mostly that runs about +20 a day lol.
 
Stainless Rolex Submariner when there is little chance that my hand will be cut off to take it.

Seiko SKX007 when there may be.
 
Too thick and most importantly no quick adjust lol! I’ve been leaning towards thinner for hunting because of how the layers of cuffs interact and annoy me. Last season wore a komandirskie tanker manual wind on leather mostly that runs about +20 a day lol.
+20 sec a day is unacceptable in my book. I'd like to know what kind of time the Omega AT provides. At 13.2mm thick, it seems like a rather slim sports watch for having 150m of water resistance.

I have a 2013 Omega PO that averages +15 seconds over 93 days, so my opinion may be a little biased. Still thin enough to hold a few banded birds on a recent goose hunt.
1741398226051.png
 
+20 sec a day is unacceptable in my book. I'd like to know what kind of time the Omega AT provides. At 13.2mm thick, it seems like a rather slim sports watch for having 150m of water resistance.

I have a 2013 Omega PO that averages +15 seconds over 93 days, so my opinion may be a little biased. Still thin enough to hold a few banded birds on a recent goose hunt.
View attachment 670000
According to my time grapher it’s running 0 seconds a day with .3m/s beat error dial up and jumps to +1 in some positions. So running well within master chronometer specs. It’s a 2020 model but looks to have not been worn much. Haven’t had it on the time grapher for very long though fedex just brought it this afternoon, I’ll see how it runs over time. First co axial for me too.

As far as the Russian stuff they’re just fun watches I’ve been rebuilding a few vintage models with CCCP marked dials, lots goes into their (lack of) accuracy. Just general machining accuracy, engineering, sub standard lubrication, lots of end shake on the pivots. They will vary as much as 30-40s seconds between positions without tuning. Their approach to domestic production is kind of interesting. Really not that bad when you consider how a modern Seiko 5 runs which is considered acceptable quality for ~$300 and they can make a watch for ~$70. I have a few modern Chinese ETA derivatives that run around 5-8 seconds across positions without tuning despite their lack of QC/cleanliness/proper lube.
 
Speaking of that, I'm overdue on a service on mine. Just a little frightened it might not be the same after I get it back.
 
Speaking of that, I'm overdue on a service on mine. Just a little frightened it might not be the same after I get it back.
Yeah it’s possible. Your PO? If it’s running strong I probably wouldn’t worry about it. If it starts running abnormally to its baseline it’s time. One good thing about co axials vs a Swiss lever is they’re not as dependent on pallet jewel lube to maintain accuracy. Downside is I’ve seen some worn escape wheels but what else will run for decades straight without wearing a few parts. In the scheme of things a hundred dollars or so in parts for years of service is worth it.

The thing with mass repair/production is they will often just regulate the watch to run within spec. Seiko does this, well everyone really. Instead of, in their eyes, wasting the time to get it running as perfectly as it can. Positive side to free sprung balances is that they can be regulated mathematically. Meaning there’s a direct output in seconds to the fractions of a turn to the weights on the balance wheel. So getting a free sprung balance to run perfectly is a little more straightforward than traditional regulating pins which are basically trial and error. So if Omegas repair does you dirty on the regulation a local watch maker could give you more personalized service with a simple regulation with Omega doing the full overhaul. Phew probably TMI, sometimes my tism gets the best of me.
 
Last edited:
@spotnspook hahaha! The tism you reference is widely understood amongst this group. Hunting, reloading, watches: these are things that can get as complex as you like. I am fascinated by quality watches. There is a some magic in making a watch accurate. I think it is some of the same magic that makes a rifle accurate, just quieter.
 
IMO and IME, you should never have a Rolex "serviced" by Rolex until there is something actually wrong with it.

I have talked with two other Rolex owners, who have confirmed this with me.

One was a lawyer who had to send send a "legal letter" to Rolex in New York, NY because it took so long that he was starting to be concerned that we might not ever get his watch back...
 
IMO and IME, you should never have a Rolex "serviced" by Rolex until there is something actually wrong with it.

I have talked with two other Rolex owners, who have confirmed this with me.

One was a lawyer who had to send send a "legal letter" to Rolex in New York, NY because it took so long that he was starting to be concerned that we might not ever get his watch back...
I had my GMT Master 2 serviced by Rolex, it took about four months. The reason I did it was that it was losing a bit of time. Also new mechanisms, whether it be a car or a watch run in and in doing so sharp edges are worn off. That gunk needs to come out as soon as possible, then you should have a far smoother run thereafter.
 
Yeah it’s possible. Your PO? If it’s running strong I probably wouldn’t worry about it. If it starts running abnormally to its baseline it’s time. One good thing about co axials vs a Swiss lever is they’re not as dependent on pallet jewel lube to maintain accuracy. Downside is I’ve seen some worn escape wheels but what else will run for decades straight without wearing a few parts. In the scheme of things a hundred dollars or so in parts for years of service is worth it.

The thing with mass repair/production is they will often just regulate the watch to run within spec. Seiko does this, well everyone really. Instead of, in their eyes, wasting the time to get it running as perfectly as it can. Positive side to free sprung balances is that they can be regulated mathematically. Meaning there’s a direct output in seconds to the fractions of a turn to the weights on the balance wheel. So getting a free sprung balance to run perfectly is a little more straightforward than traditional regulating pins which are basically trial and error. So if Omegas repair does you dirty on the regulation a local watch maker could give you more personalized service with a simple regulation with Omega doing the full overhaul. Phew probably TMI, sometimes my tism gets the best of me.
That was my plan with the PO, send it in when I start having problems.

I appreciate the knowledge drop. Lots of interesting things to learn in those two paragraphs.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
59,624
Messages
1,294,747
Members
108,362
Latest member
Juli42W67
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

schwerpunkt88 wrote on Robmill70's profile.
Morning Rob, Any feeling for how the 300 H&H shoots? How's the barrel condition?
mrpoindexter wrote on Charlm's profile.
Hello. I see you hunted with Sampie recently. If you don't mind me asking, where did you hunt with him? Zim or SA? And was it with a bow? What did you hunt?

I am possibly going to book with him soon.
Currently doing a load development on a .404 Jeffrey... it's always surprising to load .423 caliber bullets into a .404 caliber rifle. But we love it when we get 400 Gr North Fork SS bullets to 2300 FPS, those should hammer down on buffalo. Next up are the Cutting Edge solids and then Raptors... load 200 rounds of ammo for the customer and on to the next gun!
 
Top