Mark, you are correct those look like 1800s Kentucky long rifles in their hands
Apparently some people here think that buying Chinese is ok because those people employ a few Americans in their American companies. They don't see that buying American or bringing those manufacturers home to employ Americans (even if it raises the price by 10% they will be paying Americans wages and those wages will be spent in America).CENTCOM and AFRICOM Commanders testimony to the House Armed Services Committee.
Around the 48 minute mark Gen Langley is asked about the "whole of government" approach in Somalia. He gives a bit of a word salad answer but ultimately it was, in my opinion, a diplomatic way of him saying "look we're trying, but the military isn't equipped to handle everything Congressman". The Chinese for instance don't have troops in Somalia, but the entire cellular infrastructure in Somalia was built by them with Huawei equipment, which means the Chinese also own all the back doors into the network and can control what's on it. It's also important to note, that the Somali military relies heavily on this infrastructure to coordinate actions against Al-Shabab, which means by proxy US Forces advising and assisting the Somali Army rely on this infrastructure. American taxpayers footing the bill and American troops protecting Chinese infrastructure.
Around the 1:28:00 mark Gen Kurilla says 90% of Iran's sanctioned oil sales are purchased by China. It seems these sanctions could be doing serious damage to Iran if this wasn't the case. I can't imagine it's all that possible to realistically stop China from buying this oil, but there are other ways to hurt China economically. We could sanction China, stop importing many goods from them into the US, forbid US companies from dealing with the Chinese, etc.
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any real appetite in the US to deal with China, other than banning Tik-Tok (which accomplishes nothing really). I guess enough American businessmen and women are making too much money for it to be important.
Our Scout Rangers in the middle of a QRF response to some Phil SF guys that were getting hammered by the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (19 killed that day). You can see the M60s in the pic.
In this case, the terrorists are not very similar to ISIS suicide bombers, they wanted to escape and survive too much. Rather, they are not very smart mercenaries, and God knows who paid them. However, any conclusions are premature now. And I must say, statements that "these are guilty, and these are definitely innocent" produce rather the opposite effect and unnecessary suspicions. Let's face it, few people believe the claims of ISIS.I am one of the strongest opponents of the Putin regime and its actions in Ukraine on this site. However, terrorist attacks like this are the height of evil wherever they occur. My heart and my prayers go out to all of those affected by this cowardly incident. I think it is vitally important to discover the perpetrators. If it was an Islamic radical group, it is a scourge about which all of us need to cooperate.
The Islamic State Group is claiming initial credit. They have been active in Syria, Iraq, and East Africa. They seem to have been responsible for several incidents in the Caucasus over the last decade or so.
The latest statement from the Islamic State Group on their Telegram channel.
“Islamic State fighters attacked a large gathering of Christians in the city of Krasnogorsk on the outskirts of the Russian capital, Moscow, killing and wounding hundreds and causing great destruction to the place before they withdrew to their bases safely.”
So you use the behavior of the man you despise (because of said behavior, you say) to justify emulating the same behavior.I would submit that is exactly what Trump does with any number of fellow Republicans, and yet so many who support him give him a pass on it.
So you use the behavior of the man you despise (because of said behavior, you say) to justify emulating the same behavior.
Interesting.
You make a fair point with respect to the attempt to flee. On the other hand, the target and results were not so very different than November 2015 attacks in Paris, or the May 2014 attack in Brussels, while far smaller in scale did see the perpetrator both recording his actions and trying to escape. Another somewhat similar event occurred in Tunisia in 2015 at the Bardo National Museum which was closely followed by the attack on the Port Al Kantaoui Hotel. There was also the attack on the Turkish night club in Istanbul in 2017. There are several others that are similar.In this case, the terrorists are not very similar to ISIS suicide bombers, they wanted to escape and survive too much. Rather, they are not very smart mercenaries, and God knows who paid them. However, any conclusions are premature now. And I must say, statements that "these are guilty, and these are definitely innocent" produce rather the opposite effect and unnecessary suspicions. Let's face it, few people believe the claims of ISIS.
I do not believe that the US Embassy was somehow involved in the organization of this terrorist attack (although such accusations are heard in some places, because of these warnings); rather, US technical intelligence is able to read any messengers in different languages, and received some vague information about the impending crime. By the way, our government has acknowledged that such information was provided by the American special services.
News article about that firefight, was a rough situation for everyone on Basilan...
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/78739/19-soldiers-slain-in-basilan
So you use the behavior of the man you despise (because of said behavior, you say) to justify emulating the same behavior.
Interesting.
Thank you. I was basically repeating what I was told, I’ll be more careful, and what I read in one of the books. Sorry I don’t remember the title.Sorry, this doesn't sound correct, assuming (always dangerous) you are referring to the terrorist attack on the USS COLE.
Did the USS COLE have a Marine Detachment (MARDET)? I cannot comprehend that any MARDET wasn't armed with. But, since the COLE is powered by gas turbine and NOT nuclear power, I don't know why it would have had a MARDET.
Further, US Marines, other than perhaps a "Designated Marksmen" and MARSOC and Marine Raiders have not been armed with M-14's since Vietnam.
There is of course always an exception...
During Desert Storm, enroute to Kuwait as part of the 5th Marine Expeditionary Brigade (MEB), with my Marines, I stood up in port security and underway mine lookouts for the USS TRIPOLI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Tripoli_(LPH-10) . USS Tripoli (LPH-10), an Iwo Jima-class amphibious assault ship was designed to transport US Marines to contingencies. That's why my Marines and I were aboard her!
My Marines took over the M-2 .50 caliber Brownings mounted around the ship and we added our M-60's for close in security. As for me as an officer, I had only a M9 Beretta sidearm. That symbol of authority is okay for commanding men but to put my marksmanship ability to use, I drew an M-14 from TRIPOLI's armory and an automatic selector lever for it. I had a ship's machinist install it and I strutted around the ship with a loaded, full auto M-14! That weapon motivated the sailors, I kid you not!
On a Sunday without flight ops, we provide smalls arms training for the ship's crew. I had all the ship's Company Grade (Junior) officers in a line getting more instruction on the M-14 than the 5 rounds they had previously fired in their officer training. I would instruct the officers to fire a few shot one at a time, then with 3 or 4 round remaining in the magazine, I'd flip the selector lever to Auto and have them let her rip! Wow, talk about muzzle rise! I had the magazines loaded with a tracer evert third round to add to the realism! The Chief Petty Officer in charge of the ship's ammunition was torqued at me for robbing the tracers from a 4+1 (4 ball and 1 tracer) belt for this training!
When I learned of the COLE attack, I thought of my experience a decade earlier and wondered where was the in port security?
Sir, No offense taken. You mentioned Marines, who by nature practice "attention to detail" to the day we die!Thank you. I was basically repeating what I was told, I’ll be more careful, and what I read in one of the books. Sorry I don’t remember the title.
Thank you for your service and hope I didn’t offend anyone.
Appreciate the correction.
RWP
Thanks. I should have known that.Sir, No offense taken. You mentioned Marines, who by nature practice "attention to detail" to the day we die! 's
One other point of fact for your memory banks... The U.S. Navy Medical Corps' Hospitalmen (or women) are known as Corpsmen, never "medics" Like the title US Marine, Corpsmen is a title earned and revered by each every Marine who has ever been in harms way. Thus when written, it is always capitalized.
Corpsmen who serve on our "green side" are Marines by a different mother...
Bill Maher doing what he does best.
I make no excuses for Trump's behavior. He's a grown ass man, and I DO wish he'd act like it.I was merely pointing out what seemed to me to be a parallel. You took exception with a site member for what you perceived as that member running down Trump, and you asserted "making negative comments about a candidate at every opportunity equates to dissuading support for said candidate". I simply pointed out that is exactly Trump's M.O. and his supporters want to give him a pass on it, saying it's just campaign rhetoric or bluster. I personally don't think it is; I think that's really him and how he really feels. I can't begin to imagine the things he spews behind closed doors. But if you truly believe someone saying negative things about Trump is a bad thing, man... please consider applying that same rationale to Trump himself.
I was in uniform then. Care to enlighten us what your brother-in-law meant?I make no excuses for Trump's behavior. He's a grown ass man, and I DO wish he'd act like it.
I merely observe that taking every opportunity to run down the only fucking hope we have of preserving our country and justifying it by saying "He's a nasshole" is not helpful.
I relate more and more to my brother-in-laws sentiment, expressed while Carter was president, "I'm ready to shoot the next sonofabitch I see in a uniform, and I don't care if it's the mailman!"
I still have no idea what you - or he - are talking about.It's probably as well you didn't show up at his door informing him of what his government wanted him to do.