IIRC, there was a thread here a while back where someone discovered those Lee .416 Taylor dies on Amazon have the same product code as a different caliber Lee die (.308 maybe) so what they received was not .416 Taylor!
I say go for the .416 Taylor, if you solve the die problem first. If you find yourself disappointed with the Taylor at some later date then you could easily ream the chamber out to .416 Ruger without changing barrels again. I did this on a short chambered Taylor I acquired last year.
Just a thought: did you use a torque wrench to set the front action screw to the Ruger spec’d 90 in-lbs and the 2 trigger guard screws to the 45-60 in-lbs? I think I am remembering those numbers correctly. I believe Ruger came up with those specs in an attempt to eliminate stock cracking...
I still have muscle memory of upward tilting my 12ga SxS to eject hulls from CAS competition days and that technique works with the factory safety on my .450/.400 #1, but would be much nicer to just eliminate that problem with a better designed safety button.
Really nothing to debate here. Those that shoot DG with a .45-70 successfully have a story to tell that we will read about. Those that shoot DG unsuccessfully have a story told about them that we will also read about. What’s not to like?
It’s very manageable, to me at least. I put an NECG 1-1/4” butt pad on it before I fired it to increase the LOP and added a Leupold Vari-X 3iii 1.5-5 scope so I can’t comment on a bare #1 in 450/400.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.