Kootenay Hunter
AH member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2025
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 99
- Location
- BC Canada
- Member of
- DCRA, BCRA, VFGPA
- Hunted
- South Africa, Afghanistan, Canada, USA
Thanks for the uhhh.... "Critique" LOLTo add to stock design, angle of comb has a lot to do with it. Based on post #18 OP ignored all the rules of mitigating recoil and used every tactic to make it worse lol. Tons of drip at comb, drop at heel, a downward angled comb so the recoil goes right into your cheek bone, if that red piece is in fact a butt pad, holy smokes that will do next to nothing. It looks really nice imo, but if I was making a stock for anything with more kick than a 35 Whelen, or 338 win mag, it would not look anything like the stock OP ended up carving. Some people manage recoil more than others, and if he can still shoot it regardless of that design then great! But it would be managing the recoil “in spite of” that shape, not because of it
I’ve certainly sacrificed functionality for looks though too so I have absolutely no grounds to stand on in that regard. It’s funny though that the thread is titled stock shape to mitigate recoil, and OP ignored almost all of it
In the first post I talk about making two stocks, a practice stock from black walnut to get my wood work up to snuff, and then a real one. That pic is the practice stock, and it is for husky action I rebarreled to a 6.5x55, so I have no concerns about the recoil.
For the main stock I won't even be using walnut, I am going to use a nice chunk (well two laminated together) of macassar ebony for the extra density (and hence weight). And will be incorporating a lot of the things people have brought up in this thread. Including a recoil pad that is three times thicker than the one pictured.