What did you reload today?

Yeah, but there's a fingerprint left on one of the WM bullets. What is your anneal process? I'm about to start with the water pan and hand torch on a record player method. Don't laugh.
I need a pic of this method lol
Here’s mine…
IMG_0625.jpeg
 
I need a pic of this method lol
Here’s mine…
View attachment 755415
That is basically what I do, complete with the dewalt drill. I drop mine into water , not for any annealing reason ( it doesn’t matter with brass) but as I do it in low light to easily see the change in colour and I accidentally grabbed a hot case once
Gumpy
 
Punched primers, resized, deburred, scraped primer pockets, cleaned, and dried 200 pieces of….

You guessed it… 308 Winchester brass… :)

Will probably prime all the cases tomorrow if I get a little time… then charge and seat bullets later in the week whenever time avails…
 
Today it was .260 Ackley. For quite a while I've been beating my head against the wall to make 140gr H-VLDs work. I eventually found a pretty accurate load, but it was a touch on the hot side and gave me extractor marks once in a while. Velocity wasn't all that great and it was a bit on the finicky side. One day it was 1/2 MOA and the next it was a bit over 1 MOA. Needing to seat -0.070 off the lands to make the magazine work probably didn't help.

I moved to 135 grain Berger Classic Hybrid Hunters. About 11 rounds in, I was seeing higher velocities with less powder (even beyond the difference a 5 grain lighter bullet should have made), absolutely no pressure signs, and a load that stayed way under 1 MOA within a wide range of charge weights. Happy, happy. Also, I was able to move to about -0.030 and still feed from the magazine just fine.
 
Today for driven hunt
.3006 spr
Hornady FP 170gr
Viht N550 53.5gr
case PPU (2xshoot) 63mm (cap 68.40gr)
OAL 76.70mm
speed 820m/s
group is ok (use red dot) Zastava M70
 
A tale of four rifles. Two M70's in 7x57 and two M70's in .30-06.

It's hard to believe how time flies sometimes. But some 10 years plus ago I bought a M70 FW in 7x57 for my rather young son and not too long after that a M70 FW in .30-06 for my wife. Two calibers that I had never owned before....yes including the venerable 'turdy odd six.

Well load development was a breeze with both rifles. Bullet wise I wanted to stay on the lighter side with recoil being a concern for both wife and son. I also wanted to stay with my favorite North Forks bonded cores.

No problem, the 140gr for the 7 and 165gr for the 30, a dose of IMR4350 behind each and wham bam it was done quickly. 1" or better groups with both rifles. Time to go hunting and I was very happy with the bullet performance.

So now the boy has the 7x57 at his house, but still have the .30-06. Well I wanted a 7x57 for myself and decided also on picking up another .30-06, both of these of the Super Grade flavor.

So it would seem reasonable to expect those loads to repeat in the new rifles. Reasonable but in reality it hasn't been so. I struggled with the lighter bullets in both of these rifles. The only decent results I got was with the .30-06 and using Winchester Staball 6.5 with 1.25-1.5" groups, not bad but not great either. All other combinations were in the 2" or worse groups at 100 yards. I just won't accept that.

So on to 160gr for the 7x57 and 180gr for the .30-06 I've gone now. First results with IMR4350 didn't result in much improvement. So on to Vihtavuori N160 and things improved a bit but still not great. It was time to then try and old friend, H4831. It wouldn't be the first time that when going to heavier for caliber bullets that this powder worked out for me. Results are preliminary and I still have work to do to ensure repeatability, but today's results were very encouraging with a sub 1" group in the .30-06 and a 1" group in the 7x57.

H4831 will never be a fan of those seeking maximum velocity, but I load for accuracy. I'd rather miss small going slower than miss bigger going faster.

It seems just odd to me how two rifles of the same caliber from the same manufacturer, virtually identical except for the stock can shoot so differently.
 
A tale of four rifles. Two M70's in 7x57 and two M70's in .30-06.

It's hard to believe how time flies sometimes. But some 10 years plus ago I bought a M70 FW in 7x57 for my rather young son and not too long after that a M70 FW in .30-06 for my wife. Two calibers that I had never owned before....yes including the venerable 'turdy odd six.

Well load development was a breeze with both rifles. Bullet wise I wanted to stay on the lighter side with recoil being a concern for both wife and son. I also wanted to stay with my favorite North Forks bonded cores.

No problem, the 140gr for the 7 and 165gr for the 30, a dose of IMR4350 behind each and wham bam it was done quickly. 1" or better groups with both rifles. Time to go hunting and I was very happy with the bullet performance.

So now the boy has the 7x57 at his house, but still have the .30-06. Well I wanted a 7x57 for myself and decided also on picking up another .30-06, both of these of the Super Grade flavor.

So it would seem reasonable to expect those loads to repeat in the new rifles. Reasonable but in reality it hasn't been so. I struggled with the lighter bullets in both of these rifles. The only decent results I got was with the .30-06 and using Winchester Staball 6.5 with 1.25-1.5" groups, not bad but not great either. All other combinations were in the 2" or worse groups at 100 yards. I just won't accept that.

So on to 160gr for the 7x57 and 180gr for the .30-06 I've gone now. First results with IMR4350 didn't result in much improvement. So on to Vihtavuori N160 and things improved a bit but still not great. It was time to then try and old friend, H4831. It wouldn't be the first time that when going to heavier for caliber bullets that this powder worked out for me. Results are preliminary and I still have work to do to ensure repeatability, but today's results were very encouraging with a sub 1" group in the .30-06 and a 1" group in the 7x57.

H4831 will never be a fan of those seeking maximum velocity, but I load for accuracy. I'd rather miss small going slower than miss bigger going faster.

It seems just odd to me how two rifles of the same caliber from the same manufacturer, virtually identical except for the stock can shoot so differently.
Torque, tolerances, twist, time.
 
IMG_1313.jpeg
IMG_1312.jpeg
IMG_1310.jpeg
6.5 Grendel with 120gr Barnes TTSX
.375 Wby mag with 300gr Barnes TSX
6.5. Creedmoor with 140gr SST
 
Reloaded some 204 Ruger with 35 Bergers for hunting klippie this summer in RSA.
 
Today it was .260 Ackley. For quite a while I've been beating my head against the wall to make 140gr H-VLDs work. I eventually found a pretty accurate load, but it was a touch on the hot side and gave me extractor marks once in a while. Velocity wasn't all that great and it was a bit on the finicky side. One day it was 1/2 MOA and the next it was a bit over 1 MOA. Needing to seat -0.070 off the lands to make the magazine work probably didn't help.

I moved to 135 grain Berger Classic Hybrid Hunters. About 11 rounds in, I was seeing higher velocities with less powder (even beyond the difference a 5 grain lighter bullet should have made), absolutely no pressure signs, and a load that stayed way under 1 MOA within a wide range of charge weights. Happy, happy. Also, I was able to move to about -0.030 and still feed from the magazine just fine.
I have finally decided to use Swift A-Frame in 286 grain for my leopard. I loaded up 20 rounds using Big Game 60 grains producing 2442 FPS 6,000 under max PSI. Sighted it in today at 100 yards with my new Swaro VX5i 3.5-18-50. Very happy with results!
 
Thrilled with your scope choice!
 
Our Big Game Rifle Club annual Woodleigh Shoot is next weekend, with Geoff in attendance and shooting.

After a stocktake, the only loading that was required today was some .500 Jeffery, 535 grain Woodleigh softs and brass from Uncle Bruce. All done and each round test chambered.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
67,097
Messages
1,487,381
Members
143,986
Latest member
BessieGall
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Daryl S wrote on mgstucson's profile.
Hi - the only (best) method of sending you the .375/06IMP data is with photographing my book notes. My camera died so the only way I can do it is with my phone. To do that, I would need your e-mail address, as this
new Android phone is too complicated to upload to my desk computer, which would be easier and to down-grade, reduce the file sizes.
Best wishes
Daryl
Golden wildebeest cow cull hunt

swashington wrote on Hyde's profile.
Hey Steve, This is Steve Washington we met at KMG last year. I am interested in your Winchester. Would love to speak with you about it. I work third shift and I cannot take a phone with me to work. Let me know a good time to call during one of your mornings. My phone is [redacted]. Live in Florida so I have to account for the time difference.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Ray B wrote on woodsman1991's profile.
Hi @woodsman1991 -
I'm Ray [redacted]

Reply with name/address and I'll get a check into tomorrow's mail.
Boela wrote on Slider's profile.
Good day, Slider.

Do you by any chance have any 500NE brass left that you are willing to part ways with?

Best regards,
Boela Bekker.
 
Top