Alexandro Faria
AH enthusiast
This week's article- an introduction to hunting, just to open up the discussion for further topics.
The ethics of hunting- looking past the obvious
If you’ve been a hunter for any reasonable length of time, you’ve likely gotten the “If you like animals so much, why do you kill them?” question. At face value it’s a reasonable question, especially when one considers what the media has made of hunting and hunters in the recent past. However, when one starts to delve a little deeper, the question starts to appear slightly absurd. In all seriousness, you don’t have to defend your decisions, but having the conversation is important.
First, I have no desire to belittle those non-hunters willing to ask this question and have this conversation- neither should you. It’s only through honest and open discussion that we can educate people about our way of life and the complexities associated with it. Therefore, we should all approach this question (and others like it) with both patience and understanding- after all, we all want the same thing (generally), though our means may vary.
(A pig for the pot)
Second, the answer to these questions will vary widely based on the individual you ask and possibly when you ask them. However, there are commonalities or central themes which are mostly universal and I will try to touch on these as best I can, keeping in mind that there is a lot of subjectivity associated with the subject.
To understand these points, one needs to be comfortable with a fair bit of abstract thought: pulling the trigger is akin to the final whistle of a rugby game- the passion is for everything from the kick off to the final desperate play, not the whistle itself.
The quality of a hunt isn’t only dependent on the size of the animal you go home with (if any) and if it is, you’re missing the point. It’s about the early morning sunrises in bush exploding with life. It’s about standing around the campfire, coffee in hand, talking to your mates about the plans for the day to come. It’s about turning down a shot on that kudu bull because the moment wasn’t right. It’s about quality time with friends, family or yourself and the lessons we learn along the way. In short, it’s about the small things that make the world of difference.
(A Lady’s First)
Moving on from the emotive to something a little more objective, we must consider the benefits (both direct and indirect) associated with Utilization Conservation: There’s an old saying amongst farmers that goes “if it pays, it stays”- this, in short, is what Utilization Conservation is about. In a shrinking world of limited resources and ample demand, there’s very little space for something that only has sentimental value- it (the universal “it”) needs to earn its keep, or it will be replaced.
Utilization Conservation gives ecosystems teeth in the fight against development and urban encroachment by increasing quantifiable value. It’s all good and well claiming that we should leave an area alone owing to the high biodiversity or beauty of the area, but that seldom stops development of such an area if there is money to be made by building a feedlot, estate or mall. What Utilization Conservation does is create monetary value for an area without needing to change it too drastically, thereby conserving the animals and ecosystems found within. This is not to say that ecotourism doesn’t have its place, but that’s not the discussion here.
(protein)
Then one must consider the associated economic values such as contribution to GDP, contributions to tourism and the jobs created. While the numbers and values may vary based on who does the study (as with most things), what can’t be denied is that these benefits exist and all of these are simple enough to understand. When you start factoring in the food it provides, the health benefits of time spent outdoors and the potential to strengthen the family unit, the benefits start to become overwhelmingly obvious.
(Kalahari 9 years back- haven’t hunted with my father since)
So in closing, I’d argue that the “why” behind the reasons that we hunt are vast and highly personal- subjectivity abounds- but the benefits hunting provides are there to be seen by all and no amount of denial can change that. Our existence as an individual and a species means that another organism or species (theoretically) loses out. Our houses, roads, laptops and fridges are all culprits in the loss of habitat and destruction of life. So with that in mind, would it not be fair to say that Utilization Conservation is the only “activity” resulting in death of wildlife that actively works to ensure their continued (and bettered) existence as a species?
(Friends and our furry helpers)
**END**
The ethics of hunting- looking past the obvious
If you’ve been a hunter for any reasonable length of time, you’ve likely gotten the “If you like animals so much, why do you kill them?” question. At face value it’s a reasonable question, especially when one considers what the media has made of hunting and hunters in the recent past. However, when one starts to delve a little deeper, the question starts to appear slightly absurd. In all seriousness, you don’t have to defend your decisions, but having the conversation is important.
First, I have no desire to belittle those non-hunters willing to ask this question and have this conversation- neither should you. It’s only through honest and open discussion that we can educate people about our way of life and the complexities associated with it. Therefore, we should all approach this question (and others like it) with both patience and understanding- after all, we all want the same thing (generally), though our means may vary.
(A pig for the pot)
Second, the answer to these questions will vary widely based on the individual you ask and possibly when you ask them. However, there are commonalities or central themes which are mostly universal and I will try to touch on these as best I can, keeping in mind that there is a lot of subjectivity associated with the subject.
To understand these points, one needs to be comfortable with a fair bit of abstract thought: pulling the trigger is akin to the final whistle of a rugby game- the passion is for everything from the kick off to the final desperate play, not the whistle itself.
The quality of a hunt isn’t only dependent on the size of the animal you go home with (if any) and if it is, you’re missing the point. It’s about the early morning sunrises in bush exploding with life. It’s about standing around the campfire, coffee in hand, talking to your mates about the plans for the day to come. It’s about turning down a shot on that kudu bull because the moment wasn’t right. It’s about quality time with friends, family or yourself and the lessons we learn along the way. In short, it’s about the small things that make the world of difference.
(A Lady’s First)
Moving on from the emotive to something a little more objective, we must consider the benefits (both direct and indirect) associated with Utilization Conservation: There’s an old saying amongst farmers that goes “if it pays, it stays”- this, in short, is what Utilization Conservation is about. In a shrinking world of limited resources and ample demand, there’s very little space for something that only has sentimental value- it (the universal “it”) needs to earn its keep, or it will be replaced.
Utilization Conservation gives ecosystems teeth in the fight against development and urban encroachment by increasing quantifiable value. It’s all good and well claiming that we should leave an area alone owing to the high biodiversity or beauty of the area, but that seldom stops development of such an area if there is money to be made by building a feedlot, estate or mall. What Utilization Conservation does is create monetary value for an area without needing to change it too drastically, thereby conserving the animals and ecosystems found within. This is not to say that ecotourism doesn’t have its place, but that’s not the discussion here.
(protein)
Then one must consider the associated economic values such as contribution to GDP, contributions to tourism and the jobs created. While the numbers and values may vary based on who does the study (as with most things), what can’t be denied is that these benefits exist and all of these are simple enough to understand. When you start factoring in the food it provides, the health benefits of time spent outdoors and the potential to strengthen the family unit, the benefits start to become overwhelmingly obvious.
(Kalahari 9 years back- haven’t hunted with my father since)
So in closing, I’d argue that the “why” behind the reasons that we hunt are vast and highly personal- subjectivity abounds- but the benefits hunting provides are there to be seen by all and no amount of denial can change that. Our existence as an individual and a species means that another organism or species (theoretically) loses out. Our houses, roads, laptops and fridges are all culprits in the loss of habitat and destruction of life. So with that in mind, would it not be fair to say that Utilization Conservation is the only “activity” resulting in death of wildlife that actively works to ensure their continued (and bettered) existence as a species?
(Friends and our furry helpers)
**END**
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator: