Straight vs Hogback Butt stock on a Double Rifle

limpopo

AH senior member
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
72
Reaction score
137
Media
18
Member of
NRA Patriot Life Patron
Hunted
Botswana, RSA, Zimbabwe
Wondering the functional purpose for the European Hogback style buttstock on a double or any rifle for that matter. Better eye alignment/weld for iron sights? Any difference in how they handle recoil (more muzzle rise etc) ? Appreciate some information and experience from the panel of knowledge that resides here. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
the lower the buttple is in relation to the bore line, the more the thing will tear out of your hand in recoil if a big cartridge.
also this muzzle rise will make follow up shots slower.
and possibly hit you in the cheekbone.
the modern straight stock has evolved for a reason.
even pre ww2 h&h , rigby, etc stocks will be a problem like this, due to drop at heel.
bruce.
 
Thanks Bruce for all the scenarios, especially meaningful when you start to go "Big" in caliber.
 
beautiful is is as beautiful does.
those hogbacks are just plain butt ugly (pun intended) on both counts, performance and distasteful lines.
stocks have evolved a way since hogbacks ,, and the old english classic, with the modern american classic straight stock being the ultimate in lines and functionality.
bruce.
 
No one ever said "Look at the beautiful lines on that VW Beetle"...ever.
Not to mention that they are about as useful as a hogback stock.
 
The English style stock is still the best for a double rifle - it was created with that rifle and open sights in mind and is still just about perfect for that application. The best in the world still are the H&H Royal, Rigby Rising Bite, and Westley Richards. There is no "American" style counterpart for double rifles of which I am aware. One also rarely sees a "hogback" style stock on a Continental double rifle either. The raised comb as used on some German bolt action rifles and, of course famously, the Weatherby, was one solution to getting the shooter's eye appropriately positioned to use a telescopic sight. It works. The American straight comb works as well, except that it can sometimes be so high as to leave the iron sights useless (see some recent Rugers). Or the shooter trades a bruised cheek (trying to get low enough to use the irons) for less upward recoil momentum. What one sees on most purpose built DG rifles today is a compromise of the American and British styles. The butt will be relatively straight, but still retain enough drop to allow instinctive use of the iron sights for a follow-up (a very "English" concept). It is the forend that is typically longer and fuller on a rifle marketed in this country - in the "American" tradition. My Rigby Highland Stalker follows that butt stock compromise formula as do my Blaser S2 and R8. They seem to work awfully well.
 
The English style stock is still the best for a double rifle - it was created with that rifle and open sights in mind and is still just about perfect for that application. The best in the world still are the H&H Royal, Rigby Rising Bite, and Westley Richards. There is no "American" style counterpart for double rifles of which I am aware. One also rarely sees a "hogback" style stock on a Continental double rifle either. The raised comb as used on some German bolt action rifles and, of course famously, the Weatherby, was one solution to getting the shooter's eye appropriately positioned to use a telescopic sight. It works. The American straight comb works as well, except that it can sometimes be so high as to leave the iron sights useless (see some recent Rugers). Or the shooter trades a bruised cheek (trying to get low enough to use the irons) for less upward recoil momentum. What one sees on most purpose built DG rifles today is a compromise of the American and British styles. The butt will be relatively straight, but still retain enough drop to allow instinctive use of the iron sights for a follow-up (a very "English" concept). It is the forend that is typically longer and fuller on a rifle marketed in this country - in the "American" tradition. My Rigby Highland Stalker follows that butt stock compromise formula as do my Blaser S2 and R8. They seem to work awfully well.

So that begs the question of just what is the right amount of drop at heel for rifle if irons are to be used. For myself I like 1 3/4 for medium bores (this is in for a bolt rifle) but the principle is the same and I find I have a low to mid cheek hold for the low set scope and a good instinctive high cheek hold for the irons. The other good thing is that I have a more heads up stance which enhances vision over what is usual with a minimum drop at heel stock
 
I am not as well versed with large caliber rifles as most on here but I tend to find the Bavarian style stocks more to my liking, they seem to feel nicer, come up faster with instinctual sight alignment for offhand, kneeling or sitting positions while the American style stock seems to work better while shooting from the prone position or off of a bench.
 
I've noticed that with a good cut Bavarian stock, it seems to fit both with a scope and is just as comfortable with it off using open sights.

As far as recoil goes, the drop at the heal from the bore axis is what gives you the whip on big kickers. A Bavarian stock doesn't have as much drop as you would think by the looks.

My 9.3mm kicks straight back with little wip and is very functionable and comfortable to shoot.

Each of us are built different, so the best thing to do is try it for fit. It might be ugly to you, but fit like glove.

Almost forgot to add that my Beretta 9.3 has a set of 20 ga barrels, which shoot naturally as well when using this stock.

This is my experience from shooting as well, not a gun writer's who hasn't tried and is just repeating stuff they read from an older article written by someone who doesn't know as well...
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
57,728
Messages
1,238,551
Members
101,839
Latest member
HayleyH182
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on MontanaPat's profile.
hello
I am planning a trip next Sept in MT. May I ask you to tell me if I have forgotten something essential and if something is not worthy. Thank you
Philippe

Billings: little big horn battle field
MT Grizzly encounter
Rockies Museum
Great falls : CM russel museum, Lewis Clark Helena center
horseback riding
Garnet ghost town , Buffalo Range
road to the sun , apgar , hiking in Glacier NP
Anaconda
Bullet Safaris wrote on River Valley's profile.
Hi - welcome to AH!
cheers,
Nathan Askew
 
Top