generalzip
AH veteran
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2025
- Messages
- 110
- Reaction score
- 76
I’ve been researching quite a bit on these rounds and I’ve come to the following findings:
1. 458wm has a longer freebore than 458 Lott.
2. Compressed loads needed to reach higher velocities in a long action led to issues with old ammo and old powders in the win mag. Winchester responded by producing reduced loads.
3. 458 wm can be shot in a Lott chamber but will have reduced velocity.
My question is this. In a single actio. (Ruger no 1 etc) it seems to negate just about all the advantages of a Lott. In fact the wm appears to be able to be loaded longer, without compressed loads, no concern of bullet set back like in a repeater, and does so with less power and recoil and muzzle blast.
So, for all intents and purposes does the 458 Lott serve any purpose/advantage in a single action? Can’t you just load the wm longer to the same length and get a more “efficient” round with less recoil?
1. 458wm has a longer freebore than 458 Lott.
2. Compressed loads needed to reach higher velocities in a long action led to issues with old ammo and old powders in the win mag. Winchester responded by producing reduced loads.
3. 458 wm can be shot in a Lott chamber but will have reduced velocity.
My question is this. In a single actio. (Ruger no 1 etc) it seems to negate just about all the advantages of a Lott. In fact the wm appears to be able to be loaded longer, without compressed loads, no concern of bullet set back like in a repeater, and does so with less power and recoil and muzzle blast.
So, for all intents and purposes does the 458 Lott serve any purpose/advantage in a single action? Can’t you just load the wm longer to the same length and get a more “efficient” round with less recoil?