Politics

[Rocked and Loaded]

 

[franzfmdavis]

Every now and then it’s useful to zoom out a bit…

 

[Jeff505]

Mr. frostbite, this is a forum for African hunting. There are many off chutes to numerous areas. Politics is one of them. Obviously most on this forum would disagree with your points of view, nothing wrong with that. My question is do you truly have an interest in African hunting or is this simply an outlet for you to express political opinion. It is not my place to suggest that your motives are suspect, but with that being said if your only intention is to submit socialistic and anti semantic views then this might not be a community where you will find commonality.

 

[Ray B]

It's a good thing that some posters on the site remain anonymous- otherwise when something happened to @Frostbite it might be viewed as something more than a freak accident. So Please @Frostbite Please don't reveal your identity.

 

[SaintPanzer]

Funny thing happened today. I tried to block Tim Walz, and all the Frostbite posts disappeared.

 

[Sideshow]

View attachment 721775

love the shorts @Frostbite sorry about the feet and hand you live up to your handle hope it’s not your good hand that you lost

 

[Sideshow]

I'm hunting for some truth in what you wrote.

You think Theodor Herzl was a myth?

You boldly disagree with renowned historians.

Where is your authority for that?

Hey stumpy where’s YOUR authority? For an eighteen and a half year old you really need to get out more.

 

[Betterinthebush]

America’s beef producers call bullshit.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/22/trump-ranchers-beef-tariffs-argentina.html

 

[Frostbite]

Please reread my post. I was pointing out that your source of truth is complete garbage.

Let me give you another example "Blaser rifles are the best" written by People who love Blasers.

Your post (btw good job on posting a link) was an article about another subject. Which is another deflection and to get us back on subject...

You condemn the chant, "from the river to the sea" yet, or are you too busy reading the protocols of the Wiseman of Zion?

Let me give you yet another example of why you are so wrong.

Simply calling the source biased is a logical fallacy--it's not valid and it also shows a laziness and a lack of facts.

In order to make a valid attack on Blaser rifles you can't just claim that the source is biased--you would have to refute what they have said.

That means you have to make logical arguments to show that those rifles are NOT the best.

Get it now?

So do it with your specific arguments here.

And there's nothing wrong with "From the river to the sea."

All they mean by that is that they want their stolen land back.

 

[Frostbite]

Hey stumpy where’s YOUR authority? For an eighteen and a half year old you really need to get out more.

At my current age of 79 I probably get out more than I should.

 

[PARA45]

 

[Frostbite]

America’s beef producers call bullshit.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/22/trump-ranchers-beef-tariffs-argentina.html

More gifts to Argentina after giving them $20 billion of our tax dollars.

Obviously Trump is buying favors for himself or family members.

Now he has both the soybean farmers and the beef farmers against him.

 

[Brent in Az]

View attachment 721885

I use the ignore function like a wad of toilet paper. It helps eliminate the shit stains somewhat.

 

[Frostbite]

Mr. frostbite, this is a forum for African hunting. There are many off chutes to numerous areas. Politics is one of them. Obviously most on this forum would disagree with your points of view, nothing wrong with that. My question is do you truly have an interest in African hunting or is this simply an outlet for you to express political opinion. It is not my place to suggest that your motives are suspect, but with that being said if your only intention is to submit socialistic and anti semantic views then this might not be a community where you will find commonality.

Thanks for the honest question (I get so few of those).

Your answer can be found in the introductions forum.

If by "semantic" you meant "Semitic" you should back up your accusation with examples of such behavior.

I have never posted any socialistic or anti-Semitic ideas here.

I will forgive your false charge because you clearly have not read this thread in detail but instead were too easily influenced by some of the noisy few misinformed people who post nonsense here.

Thanks again. I think you are sincere in seeking truth.

 

[Frostbite]

It’s called deterrence. Make it so painful. Hamas won’t try another Oct 7th.

October 7th was a result of 100 years of Zionist mass murder and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians with millions of innocent people either killed or forced out of their homes in their own land and now in refugee status.

War crimes by Zionists caused the crimes of October 7th.

 

[Frostbite]

It's a good thing that some posters on the site remain anonymous- otherwise when something happened to @Frostbite it might be viewed as something more than a freak accident. So Please @Frostbite Please don't reveal your identity.

Sounds like a threat.

Here's some good advice.

I'm the kid who used to punch the bullies in the nose.

Anybody who thinks I can now be intimidated by threats from cowardly Internet keyboard warriors is stumbling along in fantasy.

Don't be that guy.

 

[deewayne2003]

Don't be that guy.

Seriously?..... You are that guy

 

[LivingTheDream]

Let me give you yet another example of why you are so wrong.

Simply calling the source biased is a logical fallacy--it's not valid and it also shows a laziness and a lack of facts.

In order to make a valid attack on Blaser rifles you can't just claim that the source is biased--you would have to refute what they have said.

That means you have to make logical arguments to show that those rifles are NOT the best.

Get it now?

So do it with your specific arguments here.

And there's nothing wrong with "From the river to the sea."

All they mean by that is that they want their stolen land back.

Let me explain to you why you are so wrong. You are presenting opinions and propaganda as fact. When you make an argument, you have to present facts, presenting propaganda as fact is as you described a logical fallacy.

I don't have to provide anything additional, because I have already proven that your information is biased and not factual. And therefore, irrelevant to this conversation. A rational person would consider presenting propaganda as fact, as intellectually lazy considering they didnt validate the source.

And saying there is nothing wrong with that saying which implies the genocide of Jewish people by anyone's definition is antisemitic.

I would continue but I have to fill out paperwork for an upcoming hunting trip to Africa, something that I am 100% sure you are unfamiliar with.

Good day.

 

[Frostbite]

Nearly a thousand years ago, Jews knew those who hated God, hated Jews and hated Israel would accuse them of "Stealing the land".

So that if the nations of the world will say to Israel, “You took the land by force,” Israel can reply to them, “The whole earth belongs to the Hashem. He created it... and by His will He gave [the land] to us.” - Rabbi Rashi 1040-1105AD

The gift of the land came with a condition.

The Jews don't like to talk about that but the conditions are stated clearly in their own Bible in several places.

Their sins broke the agreement.

To learn of the sins that lost them the land read Amos, Hosea, Joel, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Zechariah, and Malachi.

The sins of the mass murder of the last 100 years didn't help.

Deuteronomy 16:20
Follow justice and justice alone, so that you may live and possess the land the Lord your God is giving you.

​

 

[Frostbite]

I don't have to provide anything additional, because I have already proven that your information is biased and not factual.

How did you prove it?

You offered no proof whatsoever--you just claimed that the information is biased.

If you have proof--put up or shut up.