Need advice on scope for my first safari rifle

[Mtn_Infantry]

I have a leupold 1 -5x. Shot a buffalo at 60m, wished I had a 9 power scope, because even at 60m the engine room of the buffalo is a bit too small for 5 power. Espcially when you are staring through brush etc. And when you are on sticks, you will move around alot, they are not bench shooting stable..... so get a higher power and at least you can turn it up or down. 9 power minimum. 12x better

p.s my shot was good and the Buff expired, but it jumped up like a bee stung and took off....few heart stopping moments, but then we found it dead

What do you mean at 5x the engine room of a buffalo at 60m is small? Their vital area is practically a 10” pie plate and should be a chip shot for most hunters and shooters even with iron sights, nevermind a scope dialed to 5x.

5x at that distance, and especially 9x, your FOV has shrunk so much it’s a handicap. You’re going to really struggle to get back on him for a follow-up shot when he’s running with a scope dialed to 5x let alone 9x. At 60m or less that’s the idea scenario for a 1x or 2x.

 

[JG26Irish_2]

I watched the video by PGlass with great interest. His advice is solid even if some of it is contrarian. Experience is a great teacher. I agree with him 100% about QD mounts. Some of them work. Many cannot be trusted. Most will get you close but to me close is not good enough. If you want to use a QD mount, then bring extra ammo to use for checking zero every time the scope is replaced onto the rifle. As for the need to remove a scope while hunting because the scope became damaged? Here once more, I agree with him. It has never happened to me. I have never heard of it happening either. I am sure it has but the odds are small.

As for his assertion that the 2.5-13x scope with the 42mm objective bell is better than the classic straight DG scope? Meh. It can work. True that the larger objective gathers more light but that can be countered with very good glass. The key is to gather enough light after that, more is just more.

I have night hunted with a 70yr old optic that had only a tapered crosshair without any form of illumination. It worked fine. All I would have done to improve on that would have been a red dot lighted center dot. More magnification may help with longer shots but I would counter that proper selection of reticles can allow very precise aiming even with a lower power optic. My two current safari rifles wear 1-6x and 1-8x optics and both have a tiny little dot built into the center of the more heavy reticle. I can aim very precisely out to distances where I would never shoot on game.


Here are two examples from the same scope. The first is at 1x showing the large lighted Ghost ring with a round center dot and the second shows the same scope at 8x with the red center aiming ring and the 0.4mil center dot for very precise work. It also has a ladder for hold overs to avoid the time and risk of open turrets. With a properly accurate rifle, you can decide which eye in which to shoot your Croc.

With the classic DG scope using a straight wall 24mm objective, this enables the owner to use the lowest rings to get the scope closer to the bore centerline. Why is that important? Twofold. First it reduces the error of the bullet path to the line of sight at close range where DG hunting happens. This is small and probably negligible unless you are a perfectionist. Second, it helps the shooter to get a good solid cheek weld. That coupled with a proper length of pull helps to reduce the incidence of being scoped due to recoil. I think the cheek weld may be more important than the length of pull but they both matter. Attention to detail is a hallmark of any good hunter. If the scope is too high it is impossible to have correct cheek weld and when you fire, you head will naturally rock forward from the recoil leading to the dreaded black eye/cut brow. Modern rifles often come with adjustable comb to aid in adapting to larger scopes but most classic hunting rifles do not. I am all for bucking conventional wisdom if I have found a better way. But, when I am learning, I try to at least look first and what my predecessors have learned and try that method as a foundation for my journey.

 

[661944]

I really appreciate the input from everyone!

JG26irish_2 , i agree “when I am learning, I try to at least look first and what my predecessors have learned and try that method as a foundation for my journey.”

This is why i am asking y’all here for your experience and wisdom.

Again, thank you all!