Well the nice barrel markings sort of give it away, but the story is as follows and pics will be loaded as I go. I saw this on Gunbroker, the most dangerous website of them all!
Mind you I was not looking for another Whitworth being quite happy with my old .375, but being a militant gun looker, this caught my eye.
Reading the seller description and viewing the pics convinced me that I was looking at an early first year Whitworth Express rifle in .458 Win. Again, no use for the rifle or the round but...
So I got the date code from the seller and its 1974, first year the Whitworth was offered according to several sources. SN is in the very low 100000 range, like possibly number 24! Things I have read from other sources say that the 100K range is the earliest, B prefix like most I have seen regardless the vintage. My .375 is B2704** for example from 1983.
This .458 also has features from the early rifles. One just sold here the other day that was from 1975 and but for the fact it had been heavily 'smithed is the same as this one, but a later SN. Dont recall what number it started with, but it was a B prefix IIRC. Other shared features from early on are the different sights front and rear, different style sling studs and barrel band, and of course markings which seem to vary weekly in production!
This rifle has as shown barrel markings that I have not seen on any other Whitworth rifle, almost Bond St style. Not that this a Bond St rifle, it aint, more on that.
Anyway I was intrigued enough to post a minimum bid of $995 fully expecting, almost hoping to be outbid, nope, I won the bid.
It arrived at my dealer day before yesterday, too late to fetch it so went out yesterday to have a glance. Despite seller stating AS IS no dissassembly inspection, I popped it apart carefully to look at the stock inside, this being a .458. Predictably almost I found issues common to Mauser sporters. What surprised me was a lack of any bedding anywhere! My .375 is bedded at two points, main receiver lug and an extra steel lug screwed to the bottom of the barrel and bedded to the barrel channel. This is apparently a later product improvement feature, one badly needed I suspect. All it has is a single steel crossbolt of the 98 military style that the receiver lug butts up to, inadequate at best.
So it was cracked behind the steel crossbolt and as is normal cracked in the thin web of wood at the front of the trigger well, an easy fix, but more on that later.
Now I actually left my dealer yesterday and went home without the rifle. I thought well Hell, too much money for a project rifle. I had taken several pictures to email the seller and with these I explained the issues and asked for a return and refund. He readily agreed to this, good seller that I have worked with before. But as the evening wore on I got thinking maybe I should ask for a partial refund and keep the dang thing. He also readily agreed to this and is refunding me $300 and I went out today and bought it home.
I have already started in on repairs and its going well so far. The repair will include reinforcing the cracked areas with epoxy and wood inserts and overlays to beef up areas in need, and eventual glass bedding of the main recoil lug area and first couple inches of barrel channel.
I actually like doing this work and have done many, but for a K I didnt think I should have to but for $700 with a rarish rifle I think I can live with it.
Will post as it progresses.