Not at all...Trump said he had no idea what Wikileaks is. "Not my thing" except two years ago he "loved" it.![]()
With the news today, this one seemed particularly appropriate.![]()
Not at all...Trump said he had no idea what Wikileaks is. "Not my thing" except two years ago he "loved" it.
Not at all...Trump said he had no idea what Wikileaks is. "Not my thing" except two years ago he "loved" it.
I am not a lawyer, but I am not sure how the US case can be prosecuted against him. Sure, he “published” a lot of classified material, but that was, it appears, stolen by others - much like a newspaper publishing the Pentagon Papers. Unless he actually hacked a computer, I would think it a tough case to make with all sorts of potential freedom of the press baggage.
i agree with that....
but...
assuming he did in fact commit conspiracy and his act meets all of the elements of the crime.. he needs to be brought to the US to stand trial..
we cant pick and chose who we want to try for what... what he did is either right.. or its wrong...
selective enforcement of the law just leads to others doing the same thing later when it isnt a bonus to the republicans.. and using the fact that we didnt prosecute assange will become the defense..
dont get me wrong.. I find it appalling that manning received a 35 year sentence and then had his sentence commuted after only 7 years by Obama himself.. that alone tells you everything you need to know about this case IMO..
i just dont think we should let assange off the hook just because we like the end result of what he did.. (illegal is illegal after all...)..
Seems like this subject needs it's own thread.