375Fox
AH legend
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2020
- Messages
- 3,672
- Reaction score
- 11,850
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Media
- 157
- Hunted
- Zambia, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Cameroon
You seem to be trolling me in most cases you reply to one of my posts but I’ll give you an answer. Most farms shoot the biggest kudu genetics out, so over time the average will decrease with a high fence. Free range cattle ranches can definitely get hammered by hunting pressure, especially meat hunting pressure, but no fence/low fence allows new kudu genetics to constantly move back in. In areas where there is a large amount of cattle ranches and a large kudu population, there is no reason for owner or outfitter to continually supplement the high fence kudu. Priority will go to species not common or available outside the fence. Places like Limpopo where game is regularly supplemented I know you’ll find large kudu inside the high fence and that is why I wrote there are game farms with exceptional genetics or even a stocked breeding bull. Most farms are not 50,000 hectares (120,000 acres) like where you managed. A 20,000 acre farm would be big by most standards and the kudu genetics will get shot out over time in most cases. A 52 average will become 50 will become 48 with regular hunting. A low fence 52 average will typically remain a 52 average. A 60” low fence kudu is very difficult. I did not say it was easy. However, many high fence farms just don’t have 60” bulls on them at all and never have. Botswana being an exception to this because the farms (if you can call them that) are massive.Please explain your rational behind a completely non-rational statement such a "Generally free range bulls have better genetics than most game farms for kudu."
I'm really trying to understand what you are saying here but everything I learnt up to Masters level in Animal Breeding is railing to hard that it is making my head hurt.
Some people that does not know better might take your statement seriously!