sandman0921
AH enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2014
- Messages
- 418
- Reaction score
- 648
- Location
- Tennessee, USA
- Media
- 2
- Articles
- 11
- Member of
- SCI (Life), RMEF (Life), DU, NWTF, NRA (Patron Life), GOA, DSC (Life), WSF (Life), B&C Club (Sponsor Associate Member), USSA (Associate Member)
- Hunted
- USA (GA, TN, AR, TX, FL, UT, NM, WY, MT, AK, IL, MO, IA); Canada (NWT, BC); Africa (Tanzania)
First off, let me preface this thread by saying this is not an attempt to promote any cause or charity, and I have no affiliation with these organizations that I am asking about what-so-ever. Furthermore, this is not a blatant attempt to get people to donate, although it might be a worthy cause. I do, however, have a legitimate desire to do something to fight the scourge of poaching in Africa, beyond spending my hunting dollars there (hopefully many times) in the future. In a nutshell, I hate poachers, whether it be the large African syndicates that are reeking havoc on African species, or someone that shoots a deer off my property from the road at night with a spot light. Having said that, I have often thought it would be great to donate to causes aligned with that mission, but have been fearful that, as in many 3rd world causes that purport to help people or wildlife, my money would be wasted, or worse stolen.
What prompted this thread was an article I read in my recent Sports Afield magazine that I subscribe to. It was in the July/August 2015 (Vol. 238, No. 4) edition entitled "The Good Fight". The article can be found online at
http://www.sportsafield.com/content/good-fight
It details the support and funding of the Dande Anti-Poaching Unit (DAPU) in Zimbabwe by Buzz Charlton and Myles McCallum of Charlton McCallum Safaris (http://www.cmsafaris.com/african-elephant-research/donate.html) through Conservation Force (https://www.conservationforce.org/donateonline.html) in Louisiana. In one of the side bars, it also details the partnering of SCI with a group called "Humanitarian Operations Protecting Elephants (H.O.P.E.). I was concerned that HOPE could be a "sheep in wolf's clothing" kind-of charity in which they say they support hunting, but really don't. However, SCI did partner with them, and the statements from their leaders do suggest they view hunting as a vital tool in combating the poaching of elephants in Africa. The write-up about them in Sports Afield was also positive.
After reading about these efforts, I felt like this was a way for me to give back to a place (Africa) that I plan to visit for hunting in the not too distant future, and hopefully many times over my hunting years. It would be a way for me to impact (even in a small way) the anti-poaching efforts directly versus via government and concessions funds, etc.. To me it seems like less chance for that money to get get lost in the shuffle, and also it provides a more direct accounting of where those funds are going. I realize that there's still potential for abuse and corruption to occur, but I like this style of direct giving to something I feel passionate about.
The other potential thing I see as a benefit, is that it allows hunters to provide another, and more direct rebuttal to the criticisms of anti-hunting campaigns that PETA, WWF, etc. love to mount against the hunting community. Instead of the terse, and curt quips about, "I'm sure that lion, elephant, rhino, etc. (feel free to insert your animal of choice) fed a whole village"....or the skewed articles that try to show how trophy fees, monies paid to outfitters, concessions etc. really amount to a small amount of GDP, blah, blah, blah.....we as a community would have hard, and direct facts to rebut those smart-ass remarks. It would be another way for us to show that we put our money where our mouth is when it comes to funding conservation of species, and projects such as anti-poaching efforts that impact those threatened or endangered species. I do realize that no amount of evidence will shut the big mouth's of the "anti" zealots, but it just might go a long way to impact the vast majority of the general public that is neutral to hunting, or supports hunting, but are non-hunters. Can you imagine if the thousands of international hunters that hunt Africa alone, were to give just $100.00 a year to legitimate anti-poaching efforts how this would be perceived? That is real money to African communities, and could be stretched a long way, and hopefully make a real impact, to stem the tide of poaching across areas of Africa. It certainly could provide that PR spark that we so desperately need, and have been discussing ad nauseum on this forum, as well as other forums lately. Anyway.......
It may be naive.....but just a thought.
My real question to those in "the know", and may already be doing this, or have researched doing this is:
1) will this be worth it as far as actually doing what is intended, and combating the poachers in Africa?
2) would it be worth other organizations besides SCI, such as DSC, NPHA, etc. to partner with these organizations such as HOPE to spread the word, and solicit donations from the hunting community, ammunition manufacturers, hunting equipment vendors, and even private sector companies outside of the hunting industry.
3) would it provide a positive PR spin to the hunting community as a whole
4) do those more knowledgeable than me have any experience with these organizations, or those like them, and feel that your money is being well spent, and not squandered, or out-right stolen?
I have been very blessed in my life. I have a great family, a wonderful job, and I am able to see some amazing places in the pursuit of my hobby (hunting). I'm always being asked to give money for this charity, or that charity, or any number of causes or campaigns, and a lot of times I do, but honestly most of the time it's because I feel obligated to, or there's nothing better to give to, and I feel like I need to be doing something. This is a cause that I feel passionate about, and I could easily get behind financially.......if it is trustworthy.
Anyway, I hope this doesn't seem like I'm trying to sell these organizations, or getting too preachy, because I honestly am not. However, I thought it might be a great idea that could actually directly impact something we all feel strongly about which is protecting elephants, etc. from poachers in Africa.
As an aside, and I hope this doesn't violate any forum rules, the 2 organizations I was talking about are found here:
1) Conservation Force link: https://www.conservationforce.org/donateonline.html
2) Humanitarian Operations Protecting Elephants (H.O.P.E.): http://saveivory.org
Cheers
What prompted this thread was an article I read in my recent Sports Afield magazine that I subscribe to. It was in the July/August 2015 (Vol. 238, No. 4) edition entitled "The Good Fight". The article can be found online at
http://www.sportsafield.com/content/good-fight
It details the support and funding of the Dande Anti-Poaching Unit (DAPU) in Zimbabwe by Buzz Charlton and Myles McCallum of Charlton McCallum Safaris (http://www.cmsafaris.com/african-elephant-research/donate.html) through Conservation Force (https://www.conservationforce.org/donateonline.html) in Louisiana. In one of the side bars, it also details the partnering of SCI with a group called "Humanitarian Operations Protecting Elephants (H.O.P.E.). I was concerned that HOPE could be a "sheep in wolf's clothing" kind-of charity in which they say they support hunting, but really don't. However, SCI did partner with them, and the statements from their leaders do suggest they view hunting as a vital tool in combating the poaching of elephants in Africa. The write-up about them in Sports Afield was also positive.
After reading about these efforts, I felt like this was a way for me to give back to a place (Africa) that I plan to visit for hunting in the not too distant future, and hopefully many times over my hunting years. It would be a way for me to impact (even in a small way) the anti-poaching efforts directly versus via government and concessions funds, etc.. To me it seems like less chance for that money to get get lost in the shuffle, and also it provides a more direct accounting of where those funds are going. I realize that there's still potential for abuse and corruption to occur, but I like this style of direct giving to something I feel passionate about.
The other potential thing I see as a benefit, is that it allows hunters to provide another, and more direct rebuttal to the criticisms of anti-hunting campaigns that PETA, WWF, etc. love to mount against the hunting community. Instead of the terse, and curt quips about, "I'm sure that lion, elephant, rhino, etc. (feel free to insert your animal of choice) fed a whole village"....or the skewed articles that try to show how trophy fees, monies paid to outfitters, concessions etc. really amount to a small amount of GDP, blah, blah, blah.....we as a community would have hard, and direct facts to rebut those smart-ass remarks. It would be another way for us to show that we put our money where our mouth is when it comes to funding conservation of species, and projects such as anti-poaching efforts that impact those threatened or endangered species. I do realize that no amount of evidence will shut the big mouth's of the "anti" zealots, but it just might go a long way to impact the vast majority of the general public that is neutral to hunting, or supports hunting, but are non-hunters. Can you imagine if the thousands of international hunters that hunt Africa alone, were to give just $100.00 a year to legitimate anti-poaching efforts how this would be perceived? That is real money to African communities, and could be stretched a long way, and hopefully make a real impact, to stem the tide of poaching across areas of Africa. It certainly could provide that PR spark that we so desperately need, and have been discussing ad nauseum on this forum, as well as other forums lately. Anyway.......
It may be naive.....but just a thought.
My real question to those in "the know", and may already be doing this, or have researched doing this is:
1) will this be worth it as far as actually doing what is intended, and combating the poachers in Africa?
2) would it be worth other organizations besides SCI, such as DSC, NPHA, etc. to partner with these organizations such as HOPE to spread the word, and solicit donations from the hunting community, ammunition manufacturers, hunting equipment vendors, and even private sector companies outside of the hunting industry.
3) would it provide a positive PR spin to the hunting community as a whole
4) do those more knowledgeable than me have any experience with these organizations, or those like them, and feel that your money is being well spent, and not squandered, or out-right stolen?
I have been very blessed in my life. I have a great family, a wonderful job, and I am able to see some amazing places in the pursuit of my hobby (hunting). I'm always being asked to give money for this charity, or that charity, or any number of causes or campaigns, and a lot of times I do, but honestly most of the time it's because I feel obligated to, or there's nothing better to give to, and I feel like I need to be doing something. This is a cause that I feel passionate about, and I could easily get behind financially.......if it is trustworthy.
Anyway, I hope this doesn't seem like I'm trying to sell these organizations, or getting too preachy, because I honestly am not. However, I thought it might be a great idea that could actually directly impact something we all feel strongly about which is protecting elephants, etc. from poachers in Africa.
As an aside, and I hope this doesn't violate any forum rules, the 2 organizations I was talking about are found here:
1) Conservation Force link: https://www.conservationforce.org/donateonline.html
2) Humanitarian Operations Protecting Elephants (H.O.P.E.): http://saveivory.org
Cheers
Last edited: