Fordy
AH veteran
- Joined
- May 20, 2025
- Messages
- 116
- Reaction score
- 271
Gday Philip
All I want to do is find a better mousetrap & found by having some general conversations like I’ve started here & other threads as to find the part of the puzzle im not seeing yes I don’t know everything so my part is read , ask & learn like I have with this forum & I’ll put my part forward to hopefully get that discussion going & hopefully I can return the favour helping
)
yes I have plenty of those actual although not personally shot a elephant ( present yes on seeing ) I’d say I’ve got enough of the bovine & other critters real world results to make some textbook discussions & comparison of a “solid is a solid “ statement of no it’s not
Hence a proper solid vrs a barnes tsx comparison across various resistances & various impacts that a proper designed solid will out preform a Barnes tsx & that is where I relayed the “textbook “theory based off actuals I’ve seen of where the tsx dosent produce as consistent results as a proper designed solid with the exception of that I measure ( more to come on this as we go )
I have been known as a bullet companies worst nightmare ( that’s from a couple companies themselves & I’ll leave what individuals think as that’s varied as depends if it aligns with their choices/thoughts & don’t like what I show but factual they are ) but I overall kinda kept to myself for around 3 decades of pretty full on testing & only turned up on these types of forums due to nice people asking me please share your experience as repartition will show where a pill fails & take your beloved tsx I’ve already shown a system that guarantees more consistency but upto the individual if they use it as some have no need as they are in a sweetspot of where the Barnes works well but your 470 no it’s on the edge as it is shot as is & yes that’s based off theory of every other caliber barnes I’ve shot being roughly 8 different calibers off the top of my head into many 000’s of critters & make special note I hone in on the ones that showed poor results & replicate those as the good yes I like those but if you improve the poor results the overall gain is greater than already improving the good & leaving the poor & hope it doesn’t happen again
Stay tuned on above I’ll show the other way around as done a pretty cool test when I was trying to sort out a better option for the tiny ten on which type of bullet produced smaller wounds in these little guys as to not damage the hide with big holes
& here’s where a proper designed solid gave more damage to the hides of small critters than the likes of Barnes ,hammer nosler etip ,gs custom OEP to name a few yes don’t assume I’ve learned
Yes it a discussion we should be having & continue to have
Now I’m not saying a proper true solid will always be the only way to kill a elephant the best as potentially the day May come that someone cracks the nut on a better mousetrap but a extreme amount of testing would be needed before it could become the best & that’s by not looking @ when things go to plan & the pill worked as it’s when it will fail or @ minimum give less than ideal results that the big issue arises
Thanks for your time & looking forward to a healthy discussion on a few things that I’ve not delved deep enough in as I’m sure this post is already long enough but it will come
Sorry for my writing skills also as I’m not the sharpest tool in the shed in that field
Cheers
Textbook discussions is what I thought you were up for as if we could start on that we could move to actuals although I have no real life with the “textbook discussion “ on the 470 although a mate owns one & my ph this year also does that’s all my experience is on that & I made that clear I believe as I stated “ I’ll delve into as we go “ this part is not a textbook discussion but delving into a terminal discussion on actuals taken from many many critters that have been measured of this vrs that style or brand& more importantly where killing performance starts to lesson to darn right ridiculous & poor killing ( I’ll leave numbers out as I don’t want to get into the part of that’s not possible or look @ me syndrome as I’ve had too deal with that on the only 2 other forums I’ve visited ( I’m only present on one other these days plus here on my ph’s request this year ) one forum putting it better than another but what a $hit show it was & i don’t like it & all !!!You've shared a textbook discussion from a reloading perspective where I presented a real world experience. This is fine and it's what AH is all about. Sharing experiences.
All I want to do is find a better mousetrap & found by having some general conversations like I’ve started here & other threads as to find the part of the puzzle im not seeing yes I don’t know everything so my part is read , ask & learn like I have with this forum & I’ll put my part forward to hopefully get that discussion going & hopefully I can return the favour helping
)
yes I have plenty of those actual although not personally shot a elephant ( present yes on seeing ) I’d say I’ve got enough of the bovine & other critters real world results to make some textbook discussions & comparison of a “solid is a solid “ statement of no it’s not
Hence a proper solid vrs a barnes tsx comparison across various resistances & various impacts that a proper designed solid will out preform a Barnes tsx & that is where I relayed the “textbook “theory based off actuals I’ve seen of where the tsx dosent produce as consistent results as a proper designed solid with the exception of that I measure ( more to come on this as we go )
I have been known as a bullet companies worst nightmare ( that’s from a couple companies themselves & I’ll leave what individuals think as that’s varied as depends if it aligns with their choices/thoughts & don’t like what I show but factual they are ) but I overall kinda kept to myself for around 3 decades of pretty full on testing & only turned up on these types of forums due to nice people asking me please share your experience as repartition will show where a pill fails & take your beloved tsx I’ve already shown a system that guarantees more consistency but upto the individual if they use it as some have no need as they are in a sweetspot of where the Barnes works well but your 470 no it’s on the edge as it is shot as is & yes that’s based off theory of every other caliber barnes I’ve shot being roughly 8 different calibers off the top of my head into many 000’s of critters & make special note I hone in on the ones that showed poor results & replicate those as the good yes I like those but if you improve the poor results the overall gain is greater than already improving the good & leaving the poor & hope it doesn’t happen again
1. A solid is a solid with the exception of round nose versus flat nose. Ive spent my life killing critters and solid bullets don't do much damage whether it's a rabbit or otherwise. They just poke a hole. The point of a solid is maximum penetration.
Stay tuned on above I’ll show the other way around as done a pretty cool test when I was trying to sort out a better option for the tiny ten on which type of bullet produced smaller wounds in these little guys as to not damage the hide with big holes
& here’s where a proper designed solid gave more damage to the hides of small critters than the likes of Barnes ,hammer nosler etip ,gs custom OEP to name a few yes don’t assume I’ve learned
With respect that’s just a theory as terminal results show different outcome re my “textbook discussion “2. I am certain the rhino would have been dispatched quicker with the TSX in the scenario I presented.
Once again with respect & too others also here’s where one gets slightly off the path of terminal results being somewhat shaded in that people look @ the good & then you hear oh but it’s a once off or I’ve not seen it & my old mentor ( rest his sole ) had it correct of “Keep shooting the pattern will come “ & that’s where I’m definitely different as I hone in on the less than ideal & also a extremely important part of please clarify what is “just dead” as that to me is really open to interpretation of a few things that is also better for another day as this post already has a lot too take in3. I didn't measure the hole on the hippo I just know the TSX killed it. In my experience not a lot of forensics are required with the TSX. They are just dead. They are kinda boring!
I don’t get that as if one knows how quickly things can go to potential pear shape in click of your fingers why shouldn’t we have the discussion as to show WHY people need to be wary @ a minimum & where the likes of inferior designs yes more than Barnes out there that I can guarantee & stood up against those as totally stupidity & ego on putting out what they do got in the way of personal thoughts & selling bullets vrs the hard factual information gathered by individuals not only myself4. I didn't say I was going to hunt an elephant with a TSX I just stated that it was a discussion we were not allowed to have. I've hunted elephant and I know the scenario can change on a dime.
Regards,
Philip
Yes it a discussion we should be having & continue to have
Now I’m not saying a proper true solid will always be the only way to kill a elephant the best as potentially the day May come that someone cracks the nut on a better mousetrap but a extreme amount of testing would be needed before it could become the best & that’s by not looking @ when things go to plan & the pill worked as it’s when it will fail or @ minimum give less than ideal results that the big issue arises
Thanks for your time & looking forward to a healthy discussion on a few things that I’ve not delved deep enough in as I’m sure this post is already long enough but it will come
Sorry for my writing skills also as I’m not the sharpest tool in the shed in that field
Cheers