Boela
AH enthusiast
- Joined
- May 11, 2015
- Messages
- 282
- Reaction score
- 776
- Location
- Richards Bay
- Media
- 30
- Articles
- 3
- Member of
- Zululand Hunters & Conservation Association, South African Hunters Association, PHASA
- Hunted
- South Africa, England, Wales, Austria, Swaziland, US: Idaho, Alaska
I will respectfully exclude the likes of HO's & PH's from this category.
I was wondering what the general consensus is as to when we class a person as being an experienced Big Game / Dangerous Game hunter. I am talking about the guy that you will phone late at night asking him to accompany you on hunt, and you know that he will have your back when things go wrong (Again, we exclude HO's & PH's as back up).
Will you think of them as experienced if they have taken one species of DG on a one-day hunt, or should they have hunted multiple species over extended periods of time? Or what about the guy that can't afford a DG / BG hunt but have accompanied the hunter on such hunts.
When do we class "Joe Public" as a true, experienced dangerous game or big game hunter?
I was wondering what the general consensus is as to when we class a person as being an experienced Big Game / Dangerous Game hunter. I am talking about the guy that you will phone late at night asking him to accompany you on hunt, and you know that he will have your back when things go wrong (Again, we exclude HO's & PH's as back up).
Will you think of them as experienced if they have taken one species of DG on a one-day hunt, or should they have hunted multiple species over extended periods of time? Or what about the guy that can't afford a DG / BG hunt but have accompanied the hunter on such hunts.
When do we class "Joe Public" as a true, experienced dangerous game or big game hunter?
Last edited: