.270 Winchester Illegal?

Hank2211

AH legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
3,288
Reaction score
9,068
Media
216
Articles
4
Hunting reports
Africa
14
Member of
SCI, DU, Pheasants Forever
Hunted
Canada, United States, Zimbabwe, South Africa (Eastern Cape; Northern Cape; North West Province, Natal, Mpumalanga, Limpopo), Namibia, Cameroon, Benin, Ethiopia, Liberia, Mozambique, Argentina
According to Safari Times, Indiana has just passed a new law legalizing certain rifles for deer hunting (I had no idea any rifles were illegal!).

This law has legalized only the 243 Winchester and the .308. All other calibers are illegal.

I can sort of get why you want a lower limit - you need enough power to ensure a humane kill. That doesn't answer, though, why you need an upper limit.

Still less do I understand why anything in between is illegal. What is special about the .270 Winchester, for example, that makes it illegal for deer hunting, while calibers on either side of it are perfectly fine?

Can anyone from Indiana (or anywhere?) help with this?
 
Some info from Indiana Department of Natural Resources: http://www.in.gov/activecalendar_dn...nformation_id=18905&type=&syndicate=syndicate

Screen Shot 2016-09-10 at 3.53.14 PM.png
Screen Shot 2016-09-10 at 3.53.36 PM.png
 
Setting the .243 as a minimum could be to keep the 5.56 (.223) people out of the deer woods. Alabama did this sometime back.
 
Thanks Jerome. so it's not just the .308, but all the .300 cartridges.

But I'm still left with the question of why? Why a .243, a .300, but not a .270? Adding all of the .300's just makes it seem even more bizarre.

And why the focus on case length?

Do some legislators just have too much time on their hands?
 
Setting the .243 as a minimum could be to keep the 5.56 (.223) people out of the deer woods. Alabama did this sometime back.
But if they think that keeping the .223 people out will stop the use of "assault" rifles, they've done nothing about the other common caliber - the 7.62 (or .308 as we know it). And frankly, a decent bullet on a .223 will still kill a deer.

All something of a mystery.
 
Thanks Jerome. so it's not just the .308, but all the .300 cartridges.

But I'm still left with the question of why? Why a .243, a .300, but not a .270? Adding all of the .300's just makes it seem even more bizarre.

And why the focus on case length?

Do some legislators just have too much time on their hands?

Quite strange. Seeing that in states that have rifle hunting ( and thinking about deer hunting) I would say the 2 most common and widely used calibers are a .270 and 30-06. Certainly here is the south most people grew up with the calibers after graduating from a .243
 
But if they think that keeping the .223 people out will stop the use of "assault" rifles, they've done nothing about the other common caliber - the 7.62 (or .308 as we know it). And frankly, a decent bullet on a .223 will still kill a deer.

All something of a mystery.
I correct myself Hank. Alabama still allows .223 for deer hunting. You are correct also in that many ARs are chambered for .308 (7.62) although I believe the vast majority are still .223.
 
Quite strange. Seeing that in states that have rifle hunting ( and thinking about deer hunting) I would say the 2 most common and widely used calibers are a .270 and 30-06. Certainly here is the south most people grew up with the calibers after graduating from a .243
Agree Reedy, I went from a shotgun straight to a 30-06. Nothing else was even considered at that time!
 
Interesting. Can't imagine why the 270 would be considered not enough rifle for deer.
 
Could be the dumbest law I've ever read.....only 6mm and 30 cal for deer.....what the hell. Who comes up with this stuff? Why exclude all the calibres in between?
 
Lol - a .270 isn't enough gun but a .30 carbine is?!?
 
This has obviously got nothing to do with establishing what it and what isn't enough gun. All the 6.5s, .277, 7mm are excluded as well.
 
Y'all are assuming that the law was designed by intelligent people who understand the capabilities of different firearms, as opposed to politicians who want to make some kind of statement or point.

Quite obvious that there is nothing rational or logical or scientific here.
 
Surely someone in or about Indiana has an idea? Even an irrational one? What could the "statement or point" @Royal27 refers to be?

I thought at first it was to keep the farther" shooting calibers out of the equation - often see that in populated areas (sometimes rifles are banned altogether for that reason). But the .300 Win Mag shoots pretty far. On the other hand, the .30-30 is about as far from that as it's possible to be.

So it's not a question of distance.

It's not a question of power.

It's not a question of type of rifle - bolt vs. lever action or AR-style.

What on earth could it be?
 
Surely someone in or about Indiana has an idea? Even an irrational one? What could the "statement or point" @Royal27 refers to be?

I thought at first it was to keep the farther" shooting calibers out of the equation - often see that in populated areas (sometimes rifles are banned altogether for that reason). But the .300 Win Mag shoots pretty far. On the other hand, the .30-30 is about as far from that as it's possible to be.

So it's not a question of distance.

It's not a question of power.

It's not a question of type of rifle - bolt vs. lever action or AR-style.

What on earth could it be?

 
I actually like the Vice-President's advice. I'm not sure this advice would score him many points with his boss!

A good 12 gauge will do a lot more damage at close quarters then any rifle. Having said that, I would like to have the shotgun and the rifle, and I'm not sure why someone else feels they should be the judge of which or how many or what caliber.
 
That's a really weird law! Only 6mm/.243" diameter and .308" diameter bullets are legal? I thought Indiana was pretty much a pro-gun state? It seems like none of your state legislators have ever been hunting or have ever read anything about hunting in their collective lives. The .30 carbine is excluded since its case is shorter then 1.16".
So, if you load your 7.62x54r with .308 bullets, it's legal. If you load it with .311 bullets, you are illegal.
Could one of you who live in the Hoosier State call his or her congressman and get some clarification?
 
My point was more around the idiocy of how to use the shotgun than the validity of the weapon. A politician suggesting that the best way to defend your home is to go outside and illegally discharge your weapon into the air, using your only 2 shots?

Probably exactly how the Indiana law was made. Idiocy.

And I have a 12 gauge shotgun for home defense. It doesn't have 2 barrels though and holds way more than. 2 shells. :)
 
.300 RUM???? Good god. Are deer considered DG in Indiana? Oh well, I guess a 185 grain bullet with 107 grs. of 869 should bring those monsters to heel.:whistle:

I'm thinking they made up a list, cut out the calibers with a pair of scissors, agreed to set a numerical limit, put them in a hat and drew out the winners.
 
I'm thinking they made up a list, cut out the calibers with a pair of scissors, agreed to set a numerical limit, put them in a hat and drew out the winners

Isn't that what I said????? :E Big Grin: :E Lol:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
57,727
Messages
1,238,524
Members
101,825
Latest member
SherrieSis
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Grz63 wrote on MontanaPat's profile.
hello
I am planning a trip next Sept in MT. May I ask you to tell me if I have forgotten something essential and if something is not worthy. Thank you
Philippe

Billings: little big horn battle field
MT Grizzly encounter
Rockies Museum
Great falls : CM russel museum, Lewis Clark Helena center
horseback riding
Garnet ghost town , Buffalo Range
road to the sun , apgar , hiking in Glacier NP
Anaconda
Bullet Safaris wrote on River Valley's profile.
Hi - welcome to AH!
cheers,
Nathan Askew
 
Top