- Joined
- Jun 14, 2015
- Messages
- 8,258
- Reaction score
- 22,964
- Location
- Shreveport, Louisiana
- Media
- 278
- Articles
- 5
- Member of
- NRA, DSC
- Hunted
- Nam, Zam, Zim,RSA (Eastern Cape & NW), Canada, NZ, Alaska, TX, LA, MO, OH, MT, ID, WA, WY
The VRA case was heard by the court yesterday. This has the potential to change the midterms with Republicans potentially picking up 10-15 seats due to redistricting.
To me it looks like Sotomayer, Kagan and Jackson don’t want it changed.
Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh want it done away with completely.
Roberts and Barret want it partially changed and limited. Roberts always wants to split the baby. Barret just seems wishy washy.
The timing of the release will be critical in giving States enough time to redistrict. States may decided to redistrict prior to the decision in anticipation of a decision.
At a minimum it looks like changes to the VRA will be made in some fashion. It could come down to how well Thomas can persuade a majority to strike the VRA down.
What a fitting in your face way to leave the Court and give Trump a few months to fill the position.
View attachment 720699
The case heard by the SCOTUS was brought by the State of Louisiana. The state was forced to come up with a race-based congressional district map that create a second black majority district.
Can you spot it? Gerrymandering at it's worst!